What are the typical reliability and availability rates for Oil and Gas Rotating Equipment? We are looking to benchmark our equipment against industry standards. Are there any established industrial benchmarks for setting Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)?
If you're looking for the most up-to-date information, I highly recommend acquiring the latest edition of the OREDA databank book. It's a valuable resource for accessing the most current data available.
Josh, OREDA provides failure data but does not cover Availability or Reliability data.
I believed that OREDA would provide the necessary failure data for calculating equipment reliability metrics, or at the very least offer a range of data points.
Josh, The failure rate data is presented in the form of a range (min, max) and average values. The range can vary widely, with max/min values reaching 1000 or more in certain cases. It is important to note that the mean values may not accurately reflect the performance of your specific installation. The failure rate data provided pertains to Functional Failures, such as equipment stopping while in operation or failing to start. To further analyze this data at a more detailed level, decomposition tables can be utilized to break down the information into Failure Mode levels. However, caution must be taken as there are numerous possibilities for introducing errors during this process. It is crucial to understand that failure rates are a key indicator of Reliability, but at the Failure Mode level, not at the Equipment level where multiple Failure Modes may contribute. While OREDA can be beneficial in certain contexts, it is not suitable for benchmarking Reliability. Availability is an even more intricate concept, making it more beneficial to assess the actual performance of equipment in the field based on run length data.
Before establishing goals for the Reliability and Availability of your machines, it is essential to first assess the performance of your machines in terms of Reliability and Availability. It is also important to consider the production capacity during regular operations and the equipment configuration. For example, when using an n+1 configuration, a lower availability target may be acceptable compared to an n+0 configuration where there is no redundancy, necessitating a higher availability target. To set realistic targets for Reliability and Availability, it is crucial to have a clear strategy in place. Choosing a target percentage of 98% or 99% off the top of your head will not lead to performance improvement. Regards, Mohammad
While I can't provide exact figures as it vastly depends on the equipment type, maintaining schedule, operation conditions, etc., it is generally agreed upon in the industry that the standard benchmark for reliability and availability sits at around 97% - 98% for most Oil and Gas Rotating Equipment. There are indeed several established industrial benchmarks for KPIs, most prominently American Petroleum Institute (API) which publishes comprehensive standards for oil and gas industry equipment. Moreover, the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP) report No.485 can be of great use, as it provides a good set of standardized KPIs for equipment availability and reliability. Remember, benchmarking is far more than mere comparison. It's about understanding the gaps in our performance and working out how to close them.
While the exact reliability rate can fluctuate based on numerous factors (such as equipment quality, maintenance schedules, and the overall operating environment), it's generally agreed in the industry that an availability rate of 90-95% is considered good for Oil and Gas Rotating Equipment. As for benchmarks and KPIs, standards like ISO-14224 provide useful guidelines for collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for this type of equipment. That being said, each operation's context should also be taken into account when setting KPIs, so what works for one may not always work for another. Please make sure to align your KPIs with your unique business goals and requirements.
The reliability and availability rates can vary widely depending on the specific type of rotating equipment you're referring to, such as compressors, turbines, pumps, etc. While benchmarks can be industry specific, a common goal is to aim for 97-98% availability for critical pieces of equipment. For reliability, typically Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) is used as a KPI. By collecting and analyzing data, you can start to establish your own benchmarks. Remember, these rates can be greatly impacted by maintenance practices, operation conditions, and the age and quality of the equipment. It can be helpful to consult with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to gain more equipment-specific insights.
Great question! For oil and gas rotating equipment, typical reliability rates usually hover around 90-95%, while availability rates often range from 85-97%, depending on specific usage and maintenance practices. For benchmarking against industry standards, organizations like API (American Petroleum Institute) and ISO provide useful guidelines. Incorporating KPIs such as Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) can give you a clearer picture of your equipment’s performance relative to these benchmarks. It’s also beneficial to collaborate with industry peers to share insights and experiences that could refine your metrics further.
When it comes to reliability and availability rates for rotating equipment in the oil and gas sector, industry benchmarks generally suggest aiming for an availability rate of around 95% or higher, while reliability can vary widely depending on the specific equipment, with many striving for a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 10,000 hours or more. For KPIs, the API (American Petroleum Institute) and various asset management standards like ISO 55000 provide frameworks that can help establish metrics suited to your equipment. It might also be helpful to look into recent studies or industry reports that focus on your specific assets, as these can provide deeper insights into current performance trends and best practices.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: 1. What are the typical reliability and availability rates for Oil and Gas Rotating Equipment? - Typical reliability rates for Oil and Gas Rotating Equipment can vary depending on the specific type of equipment and operational conditions. However, industry standards often aim for high reliability rates above 90%. - Availability rates for Oil and Gas Rotating Equipment are typically targeted to be above 95% to ensure continuous operation and minimize downtime.
Answer: - To benchmark your equipment against industry standards, you can compare your current reliability and availability rates with industry averages or best practices. This comparison can help identify areas for improvement and set performance goals.
Answer: - Yes, there are established industrial benchmarks for setting KPIs in the Oil and Gas sector. Organizations like the American Petroleum Institute (API) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provide guidelines and standards for measuring and improving equipment reliability and availability in the industry.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.