Hello everyone, I have a question regarding the use of transaction IW36 in my company. We were advised by Logica not to use this transaction as it may cause more issues than it solves. However, I believe we could benefit from utilizing IW36. I am seeking clarification on whether the collective costs of sub orders raised to a superior PM order are allocated to the superior order, while individual costs are allocated to specific sub orders. This would allow me to easily track total expenses by looking at the superior order. Have any of you used IW36 before? Do you find it helpful, or would you recommend using sequential PMOs as Logica suggested? Thank you for your input.
Suborders serve a dual purpose in maintenance management - they can address any issues discovered during planned maintenance work and also help in categorizing major works based on disciplines such as static, rotating, electrical, and instrument. For example, a comprehensive work order for overhauling rotating equipment can have suborders for each discipline involved. This allows for a detailed breakdown of costs for each suborder and ensures all work is completed before the final closure of the main work order. This feature acts as a helpful reminder to ensure thorough completion of all maintenance tasks.
Hello Josh, if I understand your post correctly... the main point is that the superior order will consolidate the costs of all sub orders under it - meaning if I want to find out the total cost of all sub orders, I should refer to the superior order, right? The requirement for all other tasks to be completed before the superior order can be closed is very helpful to me. Thank you.
Absolutely! The cost for any January39 sub-order will automatically be aggregated into the superior order. You can view the total cost in the superior order and easily navigate to any specific sub-order to see the individual costs. For example, you can access the cost overview for a specific sub-order by navigating to the Goto menu in the superior order and selecting Extras -> Sub order -> Cost overview. This allows you to easily track the costs associated with each sub-order.
Thank you both so much for your excellent assistance. Your efforts are truly appreciated.
Here is an exemplar of the report mentioned by AromaticsThailand, showcasing detailed information and analysis commonly sought after by industry professionals.
From my experience, your understanding of transaction IW36 is correct. It indeed enables you to allocate the collective costs of sub-orders to the superior PM order, while equally distributing individual costs to specific sub-orders. I use IW36 often and it has simplified cost tracking significantly. However, it's essential to remember that each company has its own unique needs and processes. If Logica advised against IW36, it might be due to some specifics of your organization's operational model. I recommend discussing the pros and cons more thoroughly with your advisor before a full implementation.
Hey there, I've used IW36 in a previous company of mine and found it quite helpful indeed. What you've stated is correct - the collective costs of sub orders do get transferred to the superior order. This indeed makes it easier to track total costs. However, it's important to remember that every organization has its own unique needs and complexities. While IW36 worked for me, sequential PMOs may prove more beneficial in your context as suggested by Logica. I'd recommend having a thorough understanding of your organization's processes before determining the right approach. Hope this helps!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - It seems there are differing opinions on whether to use transaction IW36 for cost allocation in PM orders. Some have been advised against it by Logica, while others see potential benefits. It would be wise to further evaluate the pros and cons before making a decision.
Answer: - One user mentioned that using IW36 could potentially allow for collective costs of sub orders to be allocated to a superior PM order, while individual costs are allocated to specific sub orders. This feature could aid in tracking total expenses more efficiently. It would be beneficial to explore this functionality in more detail.
Answer: - It would be valuable to hear from individuals who have experience using IW36 for cost allocation in PM orders. Understanding real-world insights and feedback can provide a clearer picture of the tool's effectiveness and usability.
Answer: - The thread mentioned a suggestion from Logica to use sequential PMOs instead of IW36. Exploring the differences between these approaches and their implications for cost allocation could help in making an informed decision.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.