When configuring an FT View SE server, it is important to ensure access to the historian is available for data analysis. If you are unable to locate a client for historian access on the server, consider the possibility of it being located elsewhere for organizational purposes. However, it is recommended to also have a client on the historian server box for convenient access. Is this best practice for data management and analysis in FT View SE servers?
To set up trends for clients accessing historical data, you must have a machine equipped with an SMT (System Management Tool). This tool should be included in the historian installation and be native to the historian system. With this setup, users can easily trend, add, delete, and perform other functions within the historian.
It is recommended to restrict access to the Historian server to only those who manage its configuration. An option is to have a "client" such as FactoryTalk VantagePoint or Excel DataLink add-on for administrative use. In the past, Rockwell had a licensed OSI PI tool called 'Process Book', but its current availability is uncertain. The SMT tool mentioned by Ken is intended for administrator-level use. Our usual setup allows end-users to access data through FactoryTalk Directory member computers with VantagePoint, Excel DataLink, and/or TrendPro objects on SE graphics. Additionally, there are third-party client applications that can be configured to access Historian data.
Absolutely agree with you. Ensuring accessibility and organizational efficiency is crucial in managing an FT View SE server. Having a client on the historian server box does facilitate convenient access, and it responds quicker for data analysis. But, I'd also like to stress on the importance of having robust security measures around this setup, considering the significance of the data we are dealing with. It's beneficial to think in terms of both convenience and security – therefore, the best practice would integrate these two factors appropriately.
Absolutely, having access to the historian is fundamental for analyzing the operational data. While I agree with the convenience of having a client on the historian server box, consider the potential security risks. Multiple access points could increase the vulnerability to unauthorized data exploitation. Hence, it's vital to reinforce security measures to strike a balance between efficiency and security. Additionally, embed data validation tools to ensure the reliability of data being analyzed. This could significantly enhance the overall data management and analysis strategy.
Absolutely, having a client on the historian server is a best practice for ensuring that data management and analysis are streamlined. It not only simplifies accessibility but also allows for more efficient troubleshooting and monitoring right where the data is stored. Plus, having it available on the server itself can reduce latency issues that might arise when accessing from a remote location. It's all about enhancing operational efficiency, so I’d say that’s definitely the way to go!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: 1. Why is it important to ensure access to the historian when configuring an FT View SE server? - Access to the historian is crucial for data analysis and historical data retrieval, which are essential for monitoring and improving system performance.
Answer: - While it is acceptable to have the client located elsewhere for organizational reasons, it is recommended to also have a client on the historian server box for convenient access and efficient data management.
Answer: - Yes, having a client on the historian server box is considered a best practice as it provides easier access to historical data for analysis and troubleshooting purposes within the FT View SE environment.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.