When seeking advice on SAP-PM, it is recommended to create a new post. VinMan, a member since 2008, is seeking input from experts in SAP-PM regarding maintenance type codes for backlog work orders in breakdown scenarios. Specifically, the query involves coding for equipment failures that do not immediately impact plant operations. The discussion revolves around the use of maintenance type codes like PM01 and PM04, with concerns raised about losing track of failure events. What is the appropriate code for such scenarios? Join the conversation on this topic at http://maintenanceforums.com/e...20748073#19220748073 to share your expertise.
When it comes to coding for maintenance tasks, it's important to follow specific codes like PM01 for reactive repairs and PM04 for preventive maintenance. Both reactive and preventive maintenance should be carefully planned and scheduled to ensure timely completion. It's crucial to understand that even if breakdowns or reactive repairs are scheduled in advance, they still fall under their respective maintenance categories. This emphasizes the significance of proper planning and organization in maintaining equipment and facilities.
After mapping out the jobs, the key performance indicator (KPI) for the percentage of planned and scheduled jobs will be raised. This allows users to discern the impact of maintaining a backlog of jobs while waiting for the right opportunities to execute them.
The EN-13306 standard distinguishes between planned and breakdown maintenance types. Breakdown maintenance encompasses both immediate and deferred repairs, which should be categorized as corrective maintenance, even if they were initially postponed due to the non-urgent nature of the work.
I find the EN? standard's classification of maintenance work types into breakdown versus planned maintenance to be lacking. It may be time for an update. Which version of the standard is currently in use? Breakdowns are typically unplanned failures, unless they are part of a run-to-failure (RTF) strategy. To prevent equipment breakdowns, corrective or preventive maintenance is crucial. Unplanned breakdowns are considered the most severe form of corrective maintenance. This is why we prefer to use the term planned preventive maintenance (PPM) to distinguish from manually-triggered PM that may not have been originally planned. PPM is automatically triggered in CMMS based on specific scheduling parameters. With the right maintenance planners and CMMS expertise, all maintenance work, whether breakdown or preventive, can be effectively planned and scheduled. Urgent maintenance tasks can still be organized to prioritize safety, quality, production, and cost considerations. In conclusion, the distinction between breakdown and planned maintenance is not always clear-cut. Delayed or backlogged maintenance, even if planned, should not be classified as preventive maintenance and still falls under the breakdown category.
If someone is eager to categorize deferred breakdowns as planned maintenance, they may be hindering their understanding of maintenance terminology or attempting to bolster their planned maintenance KPIs by incorporating deferred breakdowns. Isn't that a possibility?
From my experience with SAP-PM, PM06 could be a better fit for equipment failures that don't necessarily result in immediate operational issues. It's specifically designed for condition-based maintenance, meaning it's ideal when you need to track equipment that may fail or become inefficient over time, but isn’t causing an immediate halt to operations. This could help mitigate the risk of losing track of failure events, as it aids in documenting the "wear and tear" status of equipment.
Hi VinMan, great question! For backlog work orders related to breakdowns that don't affect immediate plant operations, using PM04 (Corrective Maintenance) can be a good fit since it indicates you're addressing necessary repairs, even if they aren't urgent. Just be sure to document the failure events thoroughly so you don’t lose track of them. PM01 (Preventive Maintenance) might lead to confusion in your scenario as it’s more geared towards scheduled tasks. Monitoring how these codes affect your reports could also help refine your strategy moving forward. Hope this helps!
Hey VinMan, great topic! For backlog work orders in breakdown scenarios, specifically when dealing with equipment failures that don’t pose immediate risks to operations, PM04 (Unplanned Maintenance) might be your best bet since it allows for tracking failures without disrupting scheduled work. However, keep an eye on how you manage these entries to prevent them from getting buried over time. Implementing some regular reviews could also help you stay on top of these failures. Would love to hear how others handle this as well!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - Answer: The discussion mentions codes like PM01 and PM04, but concerns have been raised about potentially losing track of failure events. Further insights can be found in the ongoing conversation at http://maintenanceforums.com/e...2074807319220748073.
Answer: - Answer: It is suggested to create a new post on SAP-PM forums to gather input from experts in the field. VinMan, a member since 2008, is currently seeking advice on this topic.
Answer: - Answer: You can participate in the ongoing conversation and share your expertise at http://maintenanceforums.com/e...2074807319220748073.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.