I'm seeking suggestions for filling out the location field in the equipment module. We've utilized MP2 software since 1999, but there appears to be uncertainty regarding what should be inputted into this specific field. Can you recommend common practices or examples to enhance our data accuracy and organization?
In managing assets such as equipment, we utilize Datastream 7i, which is known as the advanced version of MP2. Each asset is identified by a unique code that includes information about its owner, site, and physical location. For example, a code like 342-TLF-A800 can be understood as Refining Operations - TLF Operations - Utilities Area.
I am currently in the process of configuring MP2 after a recent training session. For the LOCATION field in EQUIPMENT, I plan to use the location names I established in Facility Setup as the primary designation (such as plant floor or diesel shed). Additionally, I will utilize the "secondary location" field to provide more detailed and specific location information (for example, office 213 or plant floor grid-A 11th ceiling grid). These specific locations are particularly useful for equipment that does not need frequent maintenance and may not be easily remembered by maintenance personnel.
In my experience of using the MP2 software, enter clear, descriptive location data that is consistently formatted across all entries for the best results and ease of use. You could use a building-room-equipment hierarchical structure, such as 'Bldg1-Rm206-Printer1'. Keeping entries standardized will ensure that your database is more accurate and readily searchable. Also, you might consider labeling your equipment physically in your workspace in the same format for ease of cross-reference.
Generally for the location field in the equipment module, it's best to use a standardized format that's unique and easily identifiable for each piece of equipment. For instance, you could input a combination of the building/area name and a specific code for the equipment’s exact location within that area (e.g., 'Warehouse01_Aisle3_Shelf2'). By ensuring consistency in your entries, you'll tremendously improve data accuracy and easy retrieval. However, your choice should depend on how your team uses the location information and the granularity needed.
It's great that you're looking to enhance your data accuracy! A common practice is to use a hierarchical structure for location, which could start with broad categories like "Warehouse," "Main Office," or "Site A," and then narrow it down to specific areas like "Storage Room B" or "Training Room." This not only makes it easier to locate equipment but also helps with organization and reporting. Additionally, consider including details like floor levels or specific departments if applicable—this can really streamline tracking and ensure everyone knows exactly where each piece of equipment is located.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: Answer: Some common best practices include entering specific information such as building name, room number, or floor to provide clear and detailed location data for each equipment item.
Answer: Answer: Yes, using a standardized format for entering location details, such as following a consistent structure or naming convention, can improve data accuracy and organization within the system.
Answer: Answer: It is recommended to provide training to staff on how to input location information consistently, conduct regular audits of the location field entries, and establish clear guidelines or templates for entering location data.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.