Are you looking for information on the best practices for managing spare equipment in order to maximize availability? There are three main philosophies to consider: 1. Wait until one unit fails before switching to the spare. 2. Alternate between using both units on a weekly basis. 3. Run one unit for two weeks and then switch to the spare for one week. If you have any recommendations or suggestions on this topic, please share them!
When it comes to operating spare equipment, there is no one-size-fits-all rule. Different types of machinery and processes can impact the failure rate of equipment in various ways. It is important to consider the specific requirements of each site in order to determine the best approach. This also involves ensuring that offline equipment can function effectively as needed for the plant. It is unlikely that a single rule will be suitable for all plants. Please note that these views are my own and may not reflect those of my employer.
Terrance, it is important to note that the most critical periods for equipment are during startup and shutdown. It is advisable not to halt equipment just to switch to a spare. Instead, keep the equipment running, closely monitor its performance, and only take it out of service when monitored parameters show signs of deterioration. Remember to prioritize equipment maintenance during these crucial stages to prevent any potential issues. - Steve
In industrial settings, it is crucial to maintain equipment running smoothly during start-up and shutdowns. Instead of halting a piece of equipment to switch to a spare, it is important to keep it running, closely monitoring its performance. Only remove the equipment from service when monitored parameters suggest a degradation. This approach will help ensure efficiency and prevent unnecessary downtime.
Inquiring about strategies for maximizing equipment availability, Terrence O'Hanlon sought advice on the best approach for running spare equipment. Should one wait for a unit to fail before switching to the spare, alternate between units on a weekly basis, or implement a scheduled rotation of equipment? While some maintenance divisions rotate equipment periodically, others do not. It is acknowledged that a one-size-fits-all philosophy may not be applicable when it comes to rotating equipment. Instead of a rigid philosophy, a brainstorming session within the forum could help create a list of pros and cons for rotating spare equipment. This list can assist maintenance activities in making informed decisions. For instance, periodic rotation can serve as training for operators and mechanics, promoting familiarity with the equipment and optimizing performance. Additionally, running equipment can help circulate lubricants and prevent issues, as suggested by a mechanic recommending periodic use of car air conditioning for maintenance purposes.
Before delving deeper, it is crucial to first clarify the definition of "spare." Some may view spares as equipment that is not currently in use and stored away, while others see it as installed and ready for immediate use, with all connections set up but isolated. This concept is often referred to as redundancy. By isolating the other equipment and pressing the start/stop button, the spare can seamlessly take over. This recommendation is based on this approach.
I personally lean towards the third philosophy - running one unit for two weeks and then switching to the spare for one week. This approach essentially allows both units to be in use, but not to the point of exhaustion. As a result, we're able to maintain the health of the equipment, reducing the chances of simultaneous breakdown. Furthermore, it keeps both of the units 'warm', ensuring a smooth transition if one fails. Also, make sure to keep a regular maintenance schedule, as this significantly extends the lifespan of the equipment.
I tend to lean towards the second philosophy of alternating between units on a weekly basis. This ensures that each unit doesn't sit idle for too long, reducing the risk of startup issues caused by extended periods of inactivity. Also, regular usage allows for ongoing monitoring and early detection of any potential faults or downtimes. My suggestion is to keep a detailed maintenance and usage log for each unit to track their performance over time.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - The three main philosophies are: 1. Wait until one unit fails before switching to the spare. 2. Alternate between using both units on a weekly basis. 3. Run one unit for two weeks and then switch to the spare for one week.
Answer: - The effectiveness of each approach can vary depending on the specific equipment and operational requirements. It is recommended to assess the criticality of the equipment, maintenance schedules, and operational needs to determine the most suitable approach.
Answer: - Proper management of spare equipment can help minimize downtime by ensuring quick replacement or repair in case of equipment failure. It can also enhance operational efficiency and reduce the impact of unexpected breakdowns on productivity.
Answer: - Some additional best practices include regular maintenance and testing of spare equipment, maintaining an accurate inventory, ensuring proper storage conditions, and training staff on the correct procedures for deploying spare equipment.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.