Our team at a prominent government research facility with approximately 3000 employees is focused on creating a streamlined maintenance rework procedure. To enhance our approach, we are seeking insights on industry best practices for identifying, documenting, analyzing, and implementing corrective actions for rework. Any guidance or information on this topic would be highly valued.
Have you established a clear definition for rework? Are you utilizing a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS)? In our organization, rework is defined as any recurring maintenance tasks completed within 3 months of their initial completion. In my experience, CMMS may lack the ability to easily identify rework tasks automatically. While CMMS can group work orders for the same equipment, it may not accurately distinguish rework based on failure codes alone. Therefore, manual analysis, comparison, and decision-making are necessary, along with confirmation from the individual responsible for the task. It is possible that other organizations have found more effective ways to manage rework processes.
Hello Josh, before we proceed further, have you established a clear definition of what constitutes rework? We are currently in the process of aligning our definition with yours, which involves the repetition of the same task within a specific timeframe. However, we are facing challenges in determining the most effective time period for this definition. We are considering a timeframe of three months as it seems reasonable. Regarding our CMMS system, we are transitioning from DataStream MP5 to Invensis. I have concerns about the effectiveness of a manual identification system in our plant. There are potential issues such as trades not reporting rework to avoid revealing errors, the labor-intensive task of screening thousands of work orders for rework evidence, and equipment owners being resistant to extra administrative work. Given the complexities involved, I am curious if others have attempted to automate the rework identification process through CMMS. What obstacles have they encountered and have they achieved success? Your insights on this matter are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your assistance.
Interested in switching from DataStream MP5 to Invensis CMMS? Unsure of the effectiveness of a manual identification system at your plant? Concerned about trades not reporting rework due to a blame culture? It may be beneficial to have a maintenance planner or analyst screen data and involve trades in monthly maintenance meetings to address these issues. While processing thousands of work orders annually may seem daunting, screening them monthly for Key Performance Indicator (KPI) reporting could streamline the process. Consider entrusting this task to a maintenance planner and integrating it into monthly KPI reporting. Despite potential reluctance from equipment "owners," treating this process as essential can lead to improved maintenance overall. Have you tried automating the process through CMMS? Success may only come through a semi-automatic approach involving data screening and manual comparison between work orders. Share your experiences and challenges to collaborate and find effective solutions.
Our approach to rework differs slightly from Josh's definition. In our process, equipment is returned to operations after maintenance for acceptance testing and reintegration into service. Operators assess the equipment's condition against specific performance standards, with assistance from the mechanic, and if it meets the criteria, it is put back into service. The work order is then closed with the equipment's history documented. If the equipment does not pass testing, the operator submits a rework request. This request is treated like any other work order, but with the rework designation and the original work order number included. For us, rework is necessary when equipment fails acceptance testing upon return to operations. If the equipment passes testing but subsequently malfunctions, it is considered a repeat failure. We monitor the number of rework requests by tracking those with the rework designation. We implemented a custom field for this designation, though it could also be achieved with a work type value adjustment.
Hello Richard, have you considered that the maintenance work performed may be linked to the subsequent failure? It is possible that not all failures related to interventions occur right away, even after the equipment is put back into service and meets performance standards.
Having worked in process improvement for a number of years, I've found that the first step to streamlining any procedure is to thoroughly understand the current process. Use flowcharts or process mapping to identify potential bottlenecks and areas that need rework. Documentation is key in this phase- make detailed notes on what's working and what's not. After identifying issues, use tools like root cause analysis to get to the bottom of them. Finally, implementing corrective actions should be a team effort. Involve employees who are directly responsible for rework, as they usually have the most practical knowledge of the task at hand. Finally, don't implement everything at once. Test new processes on a small scale first, then adjust as necessary before full implementation. Always keep an open feedback loop for continuous improvement. Innovation is a journey, not a destination!
When streamlining maintenance rework procedure, one important recommendation is adopting a predictive maintenance strategy to diagnose problems before they become serious. Essentially, you will monitor equipment and analyze data to identify potential issues before they would become unavoidable reworks. Also, consider leveraging mobile technology for documenting and immediate sharing of information across different teams. It would facilitate better control, real-time updates, and operational transparency, thus strengthening the corrective actions process. Lastly, incorporate regular training for your staff on improvement methods like Six Sigma or Lean, as they can help mitigate errors and prevent future rework.
It sounds like your team is taking a proactive approach, which is great! One effective method I've seen in similar environments is adopting a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to systematically identify potential failure points in your processes. Additionally, leveraging a centralized digital platform for documentation can make it easier for all employees to access and contribute to real-time updates on rework issues and solutions. Regular training sessions and feedback loops with hands-on staff can also help in refining your procedures based on actual experiences. Have you considered implementing a pilot program to test these strategies on a smaller scale before full rollout?
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - Industry best practices for identifying maintenance rework issues typically involve establishing clear inspection protocols, conducting regular audits, leveraging data analytics for trend analysis, and encouraging staff to report issues promptly.
Answer: - Maintenance rework procedures can be effectively documented and analyzed by maintaining detailed records of rework incidents, categorizing them based on root causes, conducting root cause analysis investigations, and using data visualization tools for performance monitoring.
Answer: - Strategies to streamline the corrective action process for maintenance rework may include prioritizing critical rework tasks, establishing cross-functional teams for problem-solving, implementing automated workflows for approvals, and conducting regular reviews to assess the effectiveness of corrective actions.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.