Greetings all, Our company is gearing up for a crucial meeting to strategize on the development of a SCADA and MES system. Currently, we rely on a mix of WonderWare and custom-built applications for our operations. We are interested in gathering insights from integrators, engineers, and technicians on various SCADA and MES systems available in the market. Moving forward, we are looking to move away from our in-house applications and explore more cost-effective solutions. With a total of 15 buildings on site and an additional 5 buildings in different states, the majority of our PLCs are Rockwell, with some Siemens PLCs also in use. While we are considering Ignition for its cost-efficiency compared to WonderWare, we are open to suggestions on other platforms that may better suit our needs. We appreciate any input on the advantages and disadvantages of the systems you use to help us make an informed decision on the way forward. Thank you for your contributions in advance.
"Hands Down" Ignition provides MQTT for remote locations and OPC-UA for local networks. Boost connectivity with cutting-edge technologies like MQTT and OPC-UA.
The Old Man recommended using Ignition for remote locations and suggested employing MQTT for remote connections and OPC-UA for local networks. Which Manufacturing Execution System (MES) pairs best with Ignition for optimal performance? Although Ignition may initially appear to be just a SCADA system, it offers much more functionality and versatility upon further exploration.
Sepasoft offers a comprehensive Manufacturing Execution System (MES) software package designed for seamless integration with Ignition. Explore more about their MES solutions at https://www.sepasoft.com/ to enhance your manufacturing processes.
JordanCClark mentioned that Sepasoft offers an MES package that integrates with Ignition software. Have you had experience using Sepasoft? Share your thoughts on the pros and cons of this MES solution. Check out their website at https://www.sepasoft.com/ for more information.
Discover the advantages of integrating your MES system with SCADA in this informative blog post found on the Inductive Automation website. Learn how this integration can streamline operations and improve efficiency. Check it out now!
I've had a positive experience with Ignition, especially considering its scalability and unlimited tags and screens. It suitably allows real-time status control, alarming and data logging, UI designs, and more. On top of this, its web-based application lets us manage systems remotely, which could be beneficial if you're operating multiple buildings over different states. However, remember that your FDT/DTM needs might dictate your choice, especially if you have a lot of smart field devices. On the other hand, if your systems heavily rely on Siemens PLCs, you might want to explore WinCC from Siemens, as it's specifically designed to work seamlessly with their PLCs. It’s always a good idea to analyze all aspects of your operation before deciding on a system. Training your staff on a new platform also requires significant investment, so consider these factors in your cost-benefit analysis.
Based on your needs, I would strongly suggest considering the VTScada software by Trihedral. We've been using it in our facilities, which are spread across several locations, and we've found it to be quite flexible and scalable. It's also cost-effective without sacrificing robust features or reliability. It provides real-time operational data and integrates well with multiple PLC brands, including Rockwell and Siemens. Additionally, the software's security features are commendable, and it offers timely customer support – an aspect I find essential in such systems. However, its interface might seem a bit dated compared to WonderWare or Ignition. Final thought, always remember the most effective solution would be the one that seamlessly integrates with your current processes and infrastructure without disrupting productivity so consider doing a trial run if possible.
Hi there! It's great to see you taking the next steps to update your operations. I'd suggest taking a look at GE's Proficy Plant Applications. It's a great MES that provides good visibility and insight into your operations. If you're considering cost-effective SCADA solutions, I've found Inductive Automation's Ignition to be a great choice, as it offers unlimited clients and tags. I also like VTScada from Trihedral due to its integrated development environment, which can be a timesaver. Each system has its pros and cons, so factor in the specific needs of your on-site and remote buildings, your team's familiarity with certain software, your available resources for staff training, and compare them to the benefits each system provides. Hope this helps your decision making process!
It's great to see your proactive approach to upgrading your SCADA and MES systems! Ignition is a solid choice, especially for its flexibility and scalability, which could be beneficial given your diverse architectural needs. Another option worth considering is Siemens' own WinCC, especially since you already have some Siemens PLCs—it could offer seamless integration. Additionally, look into FactoryTalk for a more unified experience with Rockwell's offerings, which might simplify some processes for your team. Each option has its pros and cons, so it might be helpful to think about things like user training, support availability, and long-term scalability as you weigh your choices. Good luck with the meeting!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - Ignition is considered cost-effective compared to WonderWare, making it a more budget-friendly option for companies with multiple buildings. It also offers flexibility and scalability, allowing for easier integration with different PLCs like Rockwell and Siemens commonly used in industrial settings.
Answer: - Transitioning from custom-built applications to commercial systems like Ignition can be achieved by carefully evaluating the features, compatibility, and costs involved. Seeking advice from integrators, engineers, and technicians with experience in similar settings can help facilitate a smooth transition.
Answer: - When choosing a SCADA and MES system for a complex industrial environment with multiple buildings and different types of PLCs, factors to consider include compatibility with existing equipment, scalability for future expansions, ease of integration, reliability, vendor support, and cost-effectiveness.
Answer: - While Ignition is mentioned as a potential option due to its compatibility with various PLCs
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.