Is it possible for two processors in the same rack to control separate motion groups using a single Kinetix Rack and EN3TR? This setup includes a 6500/5700 rack with 8 axes, divided between 4 axes on each PLC. There may be complications to consider with the common IAM module (6500) for the Power Supply Axis (5700). According to KB sources, this configuration may not be feasible for 5500's due to BUS Sharing fault issues.
It appears that no one is answering, so I will assume the answer is "NO." Feel free to chime in whenever you're ready!
From my understanding and previous experience, you could think technically it's feasible to split the 8 axes between two PLCs, considering the BUS load is maintained. However, you might run into some practical difficulties and complexity. Rockwell Automation does share provisions for IAM/PAM sharing on its documentation. But the shared IAM (especially being a power supply axis) might create complications considering dynamic decisions during motion, and possibly lead to conflicting instructions. Moreover, the possibility of BUS sharing faults should not be overlooked. It's recommended to reach out to Rockwell support for a conclusive answer or go for separate Kinetix Racks if feasible, for a simplified and robust setup.
It sounds like you've got a complex setup there! Generally, using two processors in the same rack to control different motion groups can be tricky, especially with shared resources like the IAM module. The potential for BUS Sharing faults in the 5500 series could definitely complicate things, and even if you technically can manage the axes, the communication overhead and resource sharing might lead to performance issues or unexpected behavior. Have you considered using dedicated racks or possibly looking into using Motion Group configurations within a single processor? That might simplify things and avoid the pitfalls of shared control in the first place.
That’s an interesting setup you’re considering! From what I've gathered, it can get tricky with the architecture you've outlined, especially since the 5500 series has those BUS Sharing fault issues. You may run into complications with the common IAM module if both processors try to control their own motion groups simultaneously; the shared power supply and communication paths could lead to conflicts. If you can, it might be worth looking into using separate Kinetix racks for each processor to simplify control and avoid those potential BUS issues. Have you checked with Rockwell’s support for additional insights? They might have more tailored recommendations!
It sounds like a tricky setup, but it actually might be possible to achieve what you're looking for with some careful configuration. However, as you've noted, the common IAM module can complicate things, especially with the shared bus communication. I’d recommend checking if both processors can be truly independent in controlling the axes given the bus sharing issues. It might also be worth reaching out to Rockwell support for insights specific to your hardware version and configuration, as they could provide guidance on any workarounds or best practices to mitigate those bus sharing faults.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - Yes, it is possible for two processors to control separate motion groups in one Kinetix rack using an EN3TR module.
Answer: - The setup involves a 6500/5700 rack with 8 axes, divided between 4 axes on each PLC.
Answer: - Yes, there may be complications to consider with the common IAM module, especially for the Power Supply Axis on the 5700.
Answer: - This configuration may not be feasible for 5500's due to BUS Sharing fault issues as outlined in the KB sources.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.