When comparing position control systems in Beckhoff and Siemens, there are notable differences. In a Beckhoff setup utilizing Beckhoff drives on Ethercat, the CSP profile sends the position to the drive each cycle. The drive then interpolates this data to generate a velocity signal. Conversely, in Siemens systems with drives on Profinet and DSC technology, a velocity signal is sent to the drive for precontrol, while a position error is sent for position control within the drive. Are you familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of these two systems?
As a motion control specialist, I focus on staying updated on industry terminology and practices. I prefer a more traditional approach and am not a fan of systems that solely rely on downloading position data every millisecond for calculating velocity and acceleration. I believe that it is essential for motion controllers and drives to receive accurate and consistent position feedback with time stamping. While mathematically these methods may seem similar, the devil lies in the implementation details. In my opinion, it would be more efficient for the master to download jerk values every millisecond instead. By integrating the jerk, the drive can accurately generate target acceleration, velocity, and positions. This approach allows for better control and precision in motion control systems. Additionally, I believe that Ethercat has the capability to handle larger packets of data compared to CAN Open, allowing for more information to be transmitted efficiently. Stay updated on industry trends and technologies to ensure optimal performance in motion control systems.
CSP stands for Cyclic Synchronous Positioning. Best regards, Patrick.
If you are debating whether to use CSV instead of CSP due to newer card and software defaults, think twice. CSV is unreliable and has limited functionality. Stick with CSP for seamless performance. Set your cards to CSP, compile, download, activate, and repeat the process if needed. Ensure everything is correctly configured to CSP to avoid confusion and frustration. During communication cycles from the controller PLC to the servo controller card, the controller card autonomously manages operations to update rapidly while the controller is idle for a set period. During this interim, the controller card regulates velocity (CSV), position (CSP), or torque (CST). In my experience of configuring numerous servo motors on various machines over a decade, sticking with CSP is the way to go. Deviating from CSP led to unexpected issues and confusion. Remember that various tuning parameters may be disregarded based on the selected mode. Stick with CSP unless you have strong reasons not to. Choosing CSP typically results in smoother operation and fewer complications.
From my personal experience, both systems have distinct strengths depending on the specific requirements of your project. The Beckhoff position control system provides high-level precision as it allows micro adjustments with each cycle, best suited for applications requiring very precise control. On the other hand, the Siemens system offers robustness and simplicity in its design, since it directly sends the velocity signal for precontrol and a position error for position control. Its configuration can be less complicated than the Beckhoff system, making it a good choice for projects with broader control requirements. However, it might not deliver the same level of precision as the Beckhoff system. In conclusion, both systems are competent, but your project's specific demands will largely dictate which may be more advantageous.
Absolutely, the differences between Beckhoff and Siemens systems can really impact performance depending on the application. Beckhoff's approach with EtherCAT for continuous position updates allows for very smooth control and quick response to changes, which is great for high-dynamic applications. However, it can lead to increased bandwidth usage since position data is constantly transmitted. On the other hand, Siemens' method of sending velocity signals can be more efficient in terms of data transmission and latency, particularly for applications that don't need rapid position updates. It might be a trade-off between precision and system load, so the choice really depends on the specific requirements of the application in question.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - The advantages include sending position data to the drive each cycle, allowing for data interpolation to generate a velocity signal efficiently.
Answer: - The advantages include sending a velocity signal to the drive for precontrol and a position error for position control within the drive, providing precise control capabilities.
Answer: - Beckhoff systems utilize the CSP profile to send position data for velocity signal generation, while Siemens systems employ Profinet and DSC technology to send velocity signals for precontrol and position errors for precise control.
Answer: - The disadvantages of Beckhoff systems may include limitations in control precision and complexity when compared to Siemens systems that offer enhanced control capabilities with DSC technology.
Answer: - Beckhoff systems send position data to the drive for interpolation, while Siemens systems send a velocity signal for precontrol and a position error for precise control within the drive.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.