Hello everyone, I trust you are doing well. I have a question regarding the best practices for migrating FactoryTalk tags from RSLogix 500 to Studio 5000. After converting the project for the PLC from 500 to 5000, the HMI will need its tags and alarms replaced. How can this be efficiently accomplished, through a CSV import or manual data entry? Any insights or tips on this process would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Stu.
Any tips or guidance are greatly appreciated. Feel free to share your thoughts and suggestions!
One way to transfer tags from FTView is by exporting them, examining their structure in the export file, and mimicking it when importing the tags. This process ensures a smooth transition of tag data between systems.
I recently pondered what would happen if tags are not found in the tag database and need to be set up online. This would require manual configuration.
When it comes to optimizing code, there are different approaches to consider. One great strategy is to revamp the code by including relevant tags, UDT structures, and leveraging the organizational capabilities of logix5000. This will ultimately make it easier to update the HMI by simply retagging to the new names. Alternatively, you can use the logix conversion utility for a quicker solution, although the results may vary in my opinion. It's important to clarify whether the FT HMI is directly linked to PLC tags in the animations or if all tags are specific to the HMI. If they are HMI-specific, you can easily export, make adjustments, and import them back in. However, if there are direct references, a search and replace function may be the simplest method.
Do you have a visual demonstration of this? I attempted to find it on YouTube but was unsuccessful. I want to gather information before delving deeper into the topic. I plan to investigate further next week. Thank you for your help.
Hey Stu, I've undertaken a similar project before and from my experience, exporting your tags to a CSV file in RSLogix 500, and then importing that file into Studio 5000 is usually the most efficient way to go about it. It can save you considerable time compared to manual data entry. Just ensure you've clarified the tag addresses during the import to avoid conflicts. Furthermore, utilize the cross-reference feature in Studio 5000 to quickly adjust for any changes in tag naming convention or structure during the migration. Remember to thoroughly test everything after the migration is completed. Best of luck!
Hi Stu, hope all is well! I have handled similar migrations in the past and, in my experience, utilizing a CSV import is definitely more efficient than manual data entry. Manual entry leaves more room for error and can be extremely time-consuming, especially when dealing with larger projects. Before importing, just ensure to format your CSV file correctly; Studio 5000 has quite specific requirements regarding the format. Also, don't forget to back up all your data prior to beginning the process, just as a preventative measure. Good luck with your migration!
Hi Stu! Great question! When migrating tags from RSLogix 500 to Studio 5000, using a CSV import can definitely save you a lot of time and minimize errors compared to manual data entry. If you structure your tags correctly in the CSV format, it can seamlessly populate them in the new system. Just make sure to thoroughly validate the imported tags and alarms afterward to ensure everything works as intended. Also, consider using any existing documentation or tools that might help bridge the gap between the two systems. Good luck with your transition!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: Using a CSV import can save time and reduce the chances of manual data entry errors. It allows for bulk importing of tags, which can be more efficient for large projects.
Answer: While CSV import can be efficient, it may require some initial setup and formatting of the data in the correct structure for import. Additionally, not all tag properties may be easily migrated through CSV, so some manual adjustments may still be needed.
Answer: Manual data entry may be preferred for smaller projects with a limited number of tags or when the tag properties require individual customization that may not be easily done through a bulk import process.
Answer: It is recommended to carefully plan and document the tag mapping between the PLC and the HMI, ensuring consistency and accuracy. Testing the communication and functionality of the tags in the HMI after migration is also crucial to
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.