I am currently working on a project using iX Developer 2.22 and have encountered an issue with the Show Users Dialog feature. I require the ability for users to add new users on the site in order to track actions through the Audit Trail. I have implemented a button that opens the Show Users Dialog on a screen accessible only to individuals in the Supervisor group. However, users in the Supervisor group have the capability to modify settings for users in different groups, such as changing passwords for users in the Factory group and gaining unauthorized access to machine settings. Despite reviewing the Security settings, I have been unable to find a solution to prevent this security vulnerability. Can anyone provide guidance on how to address this issue and enhance security measures, or have I overlooked a key step in the configuration process?
I recently received a response from Beijer tech support regarding a security flaw in a dialog. The issue was confirmed to create a significant security vulnerability. Surprisingly, Beijer does not plan to address this concern, as there are users who prefer to have such vulnerabilities on their machines. Therefore, I am left with no choice but to familiarize myself with C# and develop my own dialog. This situation is quite frustrating to me. It is disappointing when companies promote 'open' systems, only to shift the responsibility of adding necessary functions onto users, causing unnecessary inconvenience.
Have you discovered any answers or advancements related to this problem?
Although a solution was found, it may not be the answer you were hoping for. I personally chose to discontinue using Beijer HMIs after this experience. However, there are still active Beijer HMI users on the site who may be able to provide you with a more suitable solution.
It sounds like you've configured most things correctly, but an aspect you might need to review is the specific roles and permissions for each user group. In iX Developer, you can assign specific access levels to every group. So, considering your case, you may want to adjust the permissions within the Supervisor group that restrict changes to other users' settings. Additionally, ensure that the Factory group is assigned an access level that doesn't permit password changing by another group. I'd recommend consulting the user manual or specific component documentation regarding user management to be sure the roles are established in line with your desired security profile. Hope this helps!
Sounds like a tricky situation you're dealing with. In your case, I would suggest creating separate user groups with distinct privileges. One group, such as the Administrators group, would have the ability to add new users and modify details, while the Supervisors group would only have a reading access to the user settings, thus not allowing them to change passwords or access other sensitive information. This kind of segregation of duties is an effective way to maintain better security control. If the iX Developer 2.22 does not allow this specific configuration, you might need to incorporate an external management tool for a more comprehensive user security system.
I think you have a potential solution within the iX Developer by assigning specific access rights to different user groups. The overall access level can be controlled by creating a hierarchy of groups where each group has specific rights. For example, a Supervisor group can have rights to add or delete users and view audit trails, while the Factory group can only regulate machine settings. To make this work, you need to carefully establish and validate the rights for each group. This might require a bit more setup time, but it should greatly enhance your project's security. It's all about fine-tuning roles and permissions, so no one has more access than they require.
It sounds like you’re dealing with a tricky security configuration! One approach you could consider is implementing role-based access control (RBAC) more thoroughly, ensuring that the Supervisor group only has rights to manage the users within their own group. You might want to review the permissions set for each user role and restrict the Supervisor’s ability to change settings for users in other groups. Additionally, consider adding a confirmation step or an approval workflow when a Supervisor attempts to make changes that could affect other groups. Sometimes, a little granular control can make a huge difference in securing your application!
It sounds like you’re dealing with a tricky security challenge! One approach you might consider is implementing role-based access controls more granularly. Instead of giving supervisors blanket permissions to modify all user settings, you could create custom roles with restricted capabilities tailored to their needs, such as limiting what they can change about users in different groups. Additionally, consider using an approval workflow for any changes that could impact security or access, so any sensitive actions require an additional verification step. Have you checked if there’s a way to set up auditing logs for user modifications as a precaution? That could help spot any unauthorized tries even if they do occur.
It sounds like you've put a lot of thought into the permissions for the Supervisor group, but it's crucial to implement role-based access control more granularly. Have you considered creating specific permissions or roles for the actions you want to restrict? Instead of allowing Supervisors full access to modify all user settings, you could limit their capabilities just to the actions necessary for their role, such as adding users without the ability to modify sensitive settings like passwords or machine controls. Additionally, double-check the hierarchy of your user groups and make sure that the settings for the Supervisor group do not inadvertently inherit broader permissions. It might help to use audit logs to track changes and understand who is making them—this can also reassure you that sensitive actions are monitored.
It sounds like you've set up a solid foundation for user management, but the concerns about unauthorized access definitely need addressing. One approach you could try is to use role-based access control more granularly, perhaps by creating specific permissions for each action within the Supervisor group, limiting their ability to modify settings for users outside their group. Additionally, consider implementing an audit log for any changes made by supervisors, so you can track who did what and when—it could act as a deterrent. Sometimes, a fresh set of eyes can help, so perhaps reviewing the documentation or even reaching out to support could uncover other configuration options you've missed. Good luck!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: Answer: To enhance security in Beijer iX Developer, consider restricting access to the Show Users Dialog feature based on user roles and permissions. This can help prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information or settings.
Answer: Answer: Yes, you can restrict the actions that users in the Supervisor group can perform within the Show Users Dialog by adjusting the permissions and settings in the Security configuration of iX Developer. Ensure that users in the Supervisor group only have access to modify settings for users within their own group.
Answer: Answer: To prevent users in the Supervisor group from modifying settings for users in different groups, review the Security settings in iX Developer and adjust the permissions accordingly. Ensure that users in the Supervisor group are only able to manage settings for users within their designated group to avoid security vulnerabilities.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.