Can someone please explain to me the proper method for calculating the urgent manhour spent indicator? I am currently utilizing two different reporting methods that yield different results. The first method involves dividing the manhours spent on corrective urgent priority tasks by the total corrective manhours spent in a month (with a target of < 10%). The second method divides the manhours spent on corrective urgent priority tasks by the total corrective and preventive manhours spent in a month (with a target of < 5%). Which method is correct, and what should be the appropriate target to set for this indicator?
Wouldn't it be more efficient to calculate based on the total man-hours of maintenance technicians? This method can lead to a more accurate assessment of workload and resource allocation.
Thank you, Josh, for providing me with the information. I utilize the overall man-hours of our maintenance staff to calculate key performance indicators (KPIs) related to man-hour efficiency.
The correct method to calculate the urgent manhour spent indicator can depend on the specific context and objectives of your operations. However, typically in maintenance management, focusing on purely corrective tasks provides a more accurate picture of urgent demand. This is because preventive tasks are generally preplanned, thus falling into the 'urgent' category less frequently. The first method you described, dividing urgent corrective manhours by total corrective manhours, would therefore likely provide a more precise perspective. As for setting an appropriate target, it largely depends on industry benchmarks and the unique goals of your organization. Always remember though, lower percentages denote a healthier maintenance strategy, as it indicates less reactive and more proactive work.
To decide between the two methods, you might want to consider what you're aiming to understand or control with the indicator. If you're trying to specifically monitor and manage your responsiveness to urgent tasks in relation to all corrective tasks, then the first method serves your purpose well. However, if your goal is to understand the proportion of urgent tasks within the whole spectrum of work (including corrective and preventive), then method two would be more appropriate. While determining the target, I believe it would largely depend on your operation speed, task volume and resources at hand. It’s always good to analyze past data (if available) and industry benchmarks (if any) to set a reasonable and challenging target.
Both methods you've mentioned can be relevant depending on the context of your work and what you intend to measure. The first method focuses primarily on the proportion of manhours dedicated to urgent tasks out of all corrective actions. The second one looks at the proportion of urgent tasks in the context of total (corrective and preventive) work. Thus, if you want to analyze your efficiency in managing urgent issues separately, the first method might be more beneficial. However, if you want a bigger picture that includes preventive tasks, the second one can provide more comprehensive insights. Setting an appropriate target percentage would depend on your team's capacity and historical data on how much time is typically needed for urgent tasks. Analyzing your past performance could give you a reasonable range to aim for.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - The urgent manhour spent indicator is a metric used to measure the amount of manhours spent on urgent priority tasks compared to the total manhours spent on corrective or preventive tasks. It is important for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of handling urgent issues within a given timeframe.
Answer: - The first method involves dividing the manhours spent on corrective urgent priority tasks by the total corrective manhours spent in a month, with a target of <10%. The second method divides the manhours spent on corrective urgent priority tasks by the total corrective and preventive manhours spent in a month, with a target of <5%.
Answer: - The correct method to use for calculating the urgent manhour spent indicator depends on the specific goals and priorities of the organization. It is important to align the calculation method with the desired outcomes and objectives of tracking this indicator.
Answer: - The appropriate target for the urgent manhour spent indicator may vary depending on the nature of the work, industry standards, and organizational goals. It is recommended to set realistic targets that reflect the organization's priorities and desired level of
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.