When facing extended downtime events like equipment breakdowns lasting 30 days, how should emergent work be coded for KPI purposes? Should all 30 days be considered emergent work, or only the first week while scheduling the remaining tasks over the following weeks?
Initially, I believed that emergent work, as you refer to it, remains constant over time. However, it appears that breakdown work, as you described it, may be the more effective approach. Are you implying that the repair for the breakdown should commence within 30 days, or that the entire repair process should be completed within that timeframe? Regardless, any emergent tasks that are planned and scheduled within the 30-day window can be classified as a backlog until they are prepared for execution.
The status of a backlog can be categorized as unplanned, planned, awaiting materials, awaiting external service, scheduled, or in progress until the work is finished. This breakdown helps track the progress of tasks and identify any delays or bottlenecks in the workflow.
In my opinion, emergent work should only account for time spent on immediate unforeseen interruptions, which would be the first week in this scenario. Extended downtime events such as this are typically handled as part of a planned outage schedule, once the initial emergent work phase has been completed. The remaining three weeks should be coded differently to differentiate between the reactive part of the job and the planned, more strategic restoration and preventive operations. Remember, consistent and accurate coding is crucial for meaningful KPI measurement and management.
I believe it's more reasonable to code the initial emergency repair work as 'emergent work', which could be the first week in this case, assuming that's the time needed for immediate fixes. The remaining period should be scheduled as planned or preventative maintenance, especially if the equipment was due for an overhaul anyway. This approach can provide a more accurate picture of unplanned versus planned maintenance in your KPI metric. Of course, the exact categorization would hinge on the nature of the breakdown and the work performed.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - Emergent work during extended downtime events can be coded based on the urgency and criticality of the tasks. It is essential to consider whether all 30 days should be classified as emergent work or only the initial period while scheduling the remaining tasks over subsequent weeks.
Answer: - Factors such as the impact of the breakdown on operations, safety considerations, criticality of the equipment, and the urgency of the repairs should be considered when determining how emergent work is coded for KPI purposes during extended downtime events.
Answer: - Organizations can establish clear guidelines and criteria for categorizing work as emergent during extended downtime. Regular communication between maintenance teams, supervisors, and stakeholders can help ensure that emergent work is accurately identified and coded for KPI tracking purposes.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.