Greetings, I have moderate experience in automation. Recently, our factory experienced a power outage, causing a SCADA condition to remain at 0 regardless of changes. Upon investigating the issue in Studio 5000, I discovered an error. Is there a method to avoid this error in the future? Additionally, is there a way to identify similar errors in my code? I have included a visual aid for reference.
If you're encountering the NaN tag receiving an incorrect value, it's important to conduct a thorough cross-reference to identify any instances where it is marked as 'Destructive' or improperly written. The NaN error, which stands for "Not a Number," typically occurs when the data in a tag does not adhere to the IEEE 754 standard for floating point numbers. This complex data type allows computers to process numerical values accurately. Unfortunately, the current data in the tag is non-compliant and cannot be understood by the PLC program.
To troubleshoot a floating-point variable issue, first, ensure that only floating-point data is being written to it. Non-floating-point data may not be compatible with a floating-point format. Next, review the values used in calculating the problematic value, as NaN (Not a Number) is typically not generated in floating-point calculations. Start by investigating the first possibility mentioned.
The term NAN typically refers to a situation where the data is corrupt or the format is incorrect. This issue is commonly seen in modbus, where bytes or words may be swapped, or there may be an offset in the registers when reading a float. Understanding the MB protocol is crucial in identifying whether the offset is either 0 or 1.
Peter Nachtwey suggested two steps to address the issue at hand. Firstly, ensure that non-floating point data is not being written to a floating point variable, as this could cause errors. Secondly, review the values used in calculating the problematic variable to rule out any potential issues. It is unlikely that a NaN would be generated in a floating point calculation, so focusing on the first step is recommended. This error may arise in large programs like the one controlling the entire production line. Is it feasible to address this issue considering the scale of the program, and is it common to encounter this error during line shutdown?
Achieving this task is achievable by following the steps outlined by others. Firstly, click on the tag OT3801_Right.EWMA and then press Ctrl+E to view the address usage. Pay attention to the 'Destructive' column as recommended by IO Rack, and double click on items marked with 'Y'. This will update the tag values, which may have been affected by an illegal mathematical operation such as division by zero. Edit the rung to prevent the execution of the operation in cases where the dividend is greater than zero.这样做是可行的。按照其他人提到的做法。1. 点击标签OT3801_Right.EWMA，然后按Ctrl + E。【这显示地址使用情况】2.在弹出的窗口中查看“Destructive”列，如IO Rack建议的那样。双击各个项目上标明“Y”的项3.标签值在那里被更改/更新。很可能发生了非法的数学运算，比如被“零”除4.编辑横梁，并防止它执行该横梁——例如被除数大于零。感谢。
Hello! Power outages can certainly create havoc with SCADA systems and it's tough to avoid completely. However, using UPS (Uninterrupted Power Supply) systems can help maintain power supply during short outages and give you enough time to safely shutdown crucial systems. With respect to identifying errors in your code, implementing fault tolerance measures and extensive error logging can assist you in diagnosing such issues. It might be worthwhile also to look into LTS (Long Term Support) versions of any programming languages or frameworks you utilize, as they often provide better stability and error management. I hope this helps!
Hey there, it seems like the power outage might have caused a slight hiccup in your SCADA system. To avoid this issue in the future, consider implementing a fail-safe or backup power system to maintain the continuity of data transmission during unexpected power interruptions. As for identifying similar errors in your code, employing a PLC error checking software could be really beneficial. These tools systematically scan your code, highlighting potential areas of concern. You can also consider integrating alarms or alerts into your system to notify you immediately of any discrepancies.
Hi there! I faced a similar issue in the past. You might want to consider integrating an Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) into your system. It can help handle sudden power outages and keep your SCADA systems running smoothly. Regarding the error you found in Studio 5000, there's an array of diagnostic tools within the software itself that you can use to detect any irregularities in your code. Do check their official documentation for guidance. Going forward, you might also want to integrate regular error-checking and debugging into your process to avoid such issues. Just my two cents, hope it helps!
It sounds like you faced quite a challenge with that power outage! To prevent similar SCADA conditions in the future, consider implementing a watchdog timer or setting up alerts for unusual states, so you get immediate notifications if something goes amiss after an outage. Additionally, for identifying errors in your code, utilizing simulation mode within Studio 5000 can help you catch issues before deploying to the actual system. Code reviews and peer input can also be invaluable for catching potential pitfalls before they escalate. Have you looked into using version control to track changes and rollback if something goes wrong?
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: 1. How can I prevent the QNAN error in SCADA automation using Studio 5000? - To prevent the QNAN error in SCADA automation with Studio 5000, it is important to ensure proper handling of power outages and unexpected interruptions. Implementing error-handling routines and backup systems can help mitigate such issues.
Answer: - To identify errors similar to the one described in the discussion thread, regularly check for anomalies in SCADA conditions and monitor for unexpected behavior. Utilizing debugging tools and reviewing logs can help pinpoint and address potential errors in your automation code.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.