I am in the process of creating general task lists, and it requires me to specify a primary work center for each operation. But why is this necessary? Can't the work center be automatically set based on the maintenance plan or when a work order is created? For example, if I have multiple areas of the plant using the same gearbox but maintained by different crews, it would be more efficient to have one task list for changing the gearbox oil that can be shared among all work centers rather than creating multiple identical task lists and adjusting the work center each time. Is there a way to share task lists not only within work centers but also across different planning plants?
Creating a comprehensive task list is essential for each work center, especially when work centers are categorized by specific work disciplines. It is important to specify which work center is responsible for maintaining each task list to ensure efficiency. If a different work center is assigned a work order, the task list ownership can easily be switched as needed. How have you structured your work centers? Do they align with work disciplines such as fluid handling, machinery, electrical, instrumentation, and civil engineering, or are they organized by work areas?
I lack access to an SAP Support Center or an ICT Engineer. Despite having "Plant Maintenance with SAP" by SAP Press, I often find SAP writings to be unnecessarily complex and vague, lacking clear instructions. My work centers are organized by area and shift in a food company setting. For instance, I have teams of mechanics for Raw-1, Raw-2, and Raw-3 shifts, as well as teams for Cooked-1, Cooked-2, and Cooked-3 shifts. Currently, when creating a general task list for tasks that can be completed by any of these 6 work centers, I have to duplicate the task list for each work center to avoid issues with reporting. This duplication becomes cumbersome, especially when updates are needed, as I must update each task list individually. This defeats the purpose of having general task lists that can be universally applied. When assigning a work order to a specific work center, the task list may still be tied to a different work center, leading to inaccuracies in reporting. Streamlining this process and ensuring that updates can be easily made to a single task list for all work centers would greatly improve efficiency and accuracy in task management for maintenance operations in the company's food production facilities.
In my food company, I organize my work centers by area and shift. For instance, there are Raw-1, Raw-2, and Raw-3 for mechanics working on the raw side during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd shifts. Similarly, there are Cooked-1, Cooked-2, and Cooked-3 for mechanics working on the cooked side during the respective shifts. These teams consist of multiple mechanics, not just one per work center. It appears that there are essentially 3 work centers based on the shifts, regardless of whether technicians are working on raw or cooked products. In larger process areas with lots of equipment, the teams can be split into separate RAW and COOKED teams. Are your tasklists designed for multi-disciplinary technicians or only mechanics? Two possible solutions include: 1) Creating a work center for the entire Maintenance Department, which can then be adjusted for specific work orders. This could be a temporary solution before implementing the second option. 2) Requesting changes from ICT or SAP to make the work center field optional rather than mandatory. Additional input from those with an ICT background would be valuable in this decision.
Is it possible to update the assigned work center in the work order to ensure that the correct team completes the job?
When reaching out to the SAP support center, their technical representative will be more than willing to provide assistance.
You make a really good point! In practical terms, this would definitely help streamline the process. However, specifying a primary work center for each operation is usually required for numerous reasons. Among other things, it helps allocate resources effectively, manages the load among crews, and importantly, facilitates tracking, reporting, and auditing. While it may seem redundant when creating task lists in cases like yours, the idea is to ensure the granularity of data. Having said that, perhaps something you could explore is if your task list creation software might allow you to use a generic placeholder or some sort of wildcard character for the work center field during task creation. This could then be replaced with the appropriate work center when creating the work order from the task list.
You raise a really valid point and I absolutely understand where you're coming from. However, delineating a primary work center for each operation aids in effective resource management and provides clarity when allocating tasks. Each work center typically has certain skills and resources specific to them, so it's important for the task to match those skills. It also helps in forecasting costs as labor rates can vary between work centers. That being said, your idea about creating a universal task list is interesting and could potentially be used in conjunction with the primary work center assignment for more efficiency. Maybe, we could have a feature for shared tasks, where general tasks like changing the gearbox oil can be set with a common task list while still specifying a primary work center for cost and resource allocation purposes.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: Answer: Specifying a primary work center for each operation helps in organizing and assigning tasks efficiently, ensuring clarity in task ownership and responsibility allocation.
Answer: Answer: While it might be more efficient to automate work center assignment based on maintenance plans or work orders, the system may require manual input to ensure accurate task allocation.
Answer: Answer: Yes, task lists can be shared among different work centers within the same plant to promote consistency and avoid redundant tasks.
Answer: Answer: Sharing task lists across different planning plants may require additional configuration or integration efforts within the plant maintenance system to ensure seamless cross-plant task list sharing.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.