How to Transfer Real Numbers into a User Defined Type (UDT) Correctly

Question:

I am attempting to transfer an array of real numbers into a User Defined Type (UDT) containing a real data type element. I have provided a snippet below displaying my COPY instruction. Unfortunately, when the COPY is carried out, it is not transferring the data correctly. The destination UDT is not receiving all of the real numbers. For example, if we have SOURCEARRAY[1] being transferred to DESTARRAY[1], the data might not be copied properly. Can anyone provide assistance or recommendations on how to troubleshoot this issue?

Top Replies

To ensure proper sequencing, FAL is a recommended method: utilize SIZE to determine the array_size (to avoid exceeding array boundaries). The length of FAL should match the array_size. Specifically, set dest as udt_array[ctrl.pos].real_element and source as real_array[ctrl.pos].

Additionally, duplicating a traditional array into a User-Defined Type (UDT) may not be successful, as the COP command functions by moving information to a sequential memory space, byte by byte.

Are you working with a data structure where you need to transfer an array of positions into elements of a User-Defined Type (UDT) array? If so, a basic COP instruction may not be sufficient. One approach could be to iterate through the data by moving each position to the corresponding element in the UDT array. You can achieve this by looping through the positions and assigning them to the appropriate elements in the UDT array. Remember to include a limit check to ensure the loop stops at the highest index value. This method allows for a more precise transfer of data from the source to the destination.

As per the recommendation from Destination, utilizing a FAL (Flexible Array Length) is the most efficient method for transferring arrays into non-contiguous array elements. This approach eliminates the need for looping as the FAL simplifies the process.

It sounds like the indexing might be the issue here. Remember that arrays in many programming languages are zero-indexed, which means they start from 0 rather than 1. So in your example, the first element in SOURCEARRAY would be SOURCEARRAY[0], not SOURCEARRAY[1]. If you’re starting to transfer from SOURCEARRAY[1], you might be inadvertently leaving out the first real number in your array. Try adjusting the way you're referencing your array components and see if that solves the problem.

It sounds like you might be experiencing a size discrepancy between your source array and the destination UDT. I'd recommend you first check if the size of your UDT is equal to or larger than your source array. If that's not the issue, another possibility could be a difference in the data types of your array and UDT. Ensure they're compatible and the UDT is capable of storing the real numbers from your array. Also, consider trying smaller arrays to check if the COPY instruction works correctly in those cases, which would help isolate the problem. Don't forget debugging step by step can be a crucial help in such situations.

It sounds like you're encountering some issues with how the COPY instruction handles the data transfer between arrays and UDTs. One thing to check is whether the size of your SOURCEARRAY matches the size of your DESTARRAY, as mismatched sizes might lead to incomplete transfers. Also, ensure that your UDT is properly defined and that each element is correctly indexed during the COPY operation. You might want to print out the values before and after the copy to debug further and see where exactly the data is getting lost. Lastly, confirming that both arrays are of compatible types is essential—sometimes subtle type mismatches can lead to unexpected behavior. Good luck!

More Replies →

Streamline Your Asset Management
See How Oxmaint Works!!

✅   Work Order Management

✅   Asset Tracking

✅   Preventive Maintenance

✅   Inspection Report

We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.

To add a comment, please sign in or register if you haven't already..   

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

FAQ: 1. Why is the real number data not being transferred correctly into the User Defined Type (UDT)?

Answer: - The issue could be related to how the COPY instruction is implemented. It is important to ensure that the data transfer is done accurately, considering the structure and format of the UDT.

FAQ: 2. How can I troubleshoot the problem of real numbers not being copied correctly into the UDT?

Answer: - You can start by checking the implementation of the COPY instruction and verifying that the data mapping from the source array to the destination UDT is correct. Additionally, debugging techniques like printing values at different stages can help identify where the problem lies.

FAQ: 3. Are there any specific considerations or best practices when transferring real numbers into a UDT?

Answer: - When transferring real numbers into a UDT, ensure that the data types match between the source array and the UDT element. Pay attention to any potential data loss due to type conversions or truncation during the transfer process.

FAQ: 4. Is there a recommended approach or technique for transferring real numbers into a UDT accurately?

Answer: - One approach could be to iterate over the source array elements and assign them individually to the corresponding UDT elements, ensuring proper data conversion and handling to maintain data integrity during the transfer.

Ready to Simplify Maintenance?

Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.

Request Demo  â†’