Are you looking to improve your PLC programming skills? I have a challenge for you that involves creating a device to detect air leaks in cartridges. This project does not involve any financial gain; I am simply assisting a friend. If you are interested in collaborating, I would appreciate it and highly recommend it as a valuable PLC problem-solving exercise. The project uses the outdated Panasonic FP0R-C16T PLC model, which has been repurposed for this task at no cost. The device includes various sensors and pneumatic valves to test the integrity of the cartridges. Key components include: - X1: Cartridge sensor - X2: Seal sensor - X3: Pressure sensor - Y0: Pneumatic valve for sealing - Y1: Pneumatic valve for generating vacuum - Y2: Green light for indicating a good cartridge - Y3: Red light for indicating a bad cartridge The logic of the system involves the sensors detecting the presence of the cartridge, sealing it, generating vacuum, monitoring pressure, and ultimately determining the quality of the cartridge. While a press transmitter with analog input would be ideal for more accurate readings, the project currently uses a basic pressure sensor. Overall, this project offers a valuable learning experience for PLC programmers. Join me in this challenge and gain practical knowledge in PLC programming. Thank you to all those who participate in advance.
In the past, I have completed numerous pressure and vacuum testing projects, such as pressurizing a vessel (such as packaging or a pressure vessel) and conducting seal strength testing on sealed food trays using a cylinder. Vacuum seal testing has also been a part of my experience. These projects require a significant amount of engineering knowledge and specialized hardware. However, for those looking to learn, there are simpler simulation exercises available, such as simulating traffic lights or a batching tank process, which can be tailored to different levels of complexity depending on experience. The batching process, in particular, can serve as a valuable learning tool for understanding systems like recipe management, analogues, and sequence control in PLC programming.
Alendi stated that if the vacuum in the cartridge dissipates in under 3 seconds, it is considered defective, while if it stays for 6 seconds or more, it is deemed to be functioning properly. But what if the vacuum lingers for a time between 3 and 6 seconds? Does this indicate a faulty seal or a properly sealed cartridge?
When conducting a vacuum test, it is important to ensure that the vacuum is held for a minimum of 3 seconds for accurate results. In my experience, it is beneficial to allow for a brief delay before initiating the test to allow the vacuum or pressure to stabilize. Depending on the specific requirements of the customer, holding the vacuum for 5-7 seconds may be necessary for pack testing, while pressure or vacuum vessels may require a longer duration.
Alendi noted that PLCs require strict and unambiguous definitions for states and transitions, rather than qualitative descriptions like "more or less." Failure to adhere to expected behavior in any state should lead to a system failure. For instance, when the X7 push-button is pressed, the system should return to a state named "RESET," which marks the beginning of the sequence. It might be beneficial to have two RESET states: RESET_REMOVE_CARTRIDGE, assuming the cartridge is present (X1 value is 1) when X7 is activated, and RESET_READY for when the cartridge is absent, and the system is awaiting the next cartridge. A timer should be implemented for cartridge removal to prevent premature transitions between states. In the state RESET_READY, the X1 sensor should detect the presence of a cartridge, triggering a sequence leading to the closure of seal Y0 after a 1-second delay. Transitioning to the "START" state should occur upon edge detection of sensor X1, signaled by the loss of the cartridge-present sensor signal. Similarly, the system should progress to the "SEALED" state when X2 detects the correct sealed position, enabling the valve Y1 to generate vacuum pressure. It is essential to monitor the vacuum pressure to ensure it reaches the desired level within a specified timeframe. When transitioning from the "SEALED" state to the "TESTING" state, various conditions such as vacuum levels and timer expiration should be met. The system should respond accordingly and activate corresponding outputs, such as Y2 (green light) for a successful test or Y3 (red light) for a failed test. To enhance clarity and ease of understanding, defining states and transitions in a systematic manner using integer values can streamline the logic and coding process. By separating the sequence logic from the operational logic, the code can be structured more efficiently, facilitating maintenance and future modifications if required. This structured approach helps in ensuring that the code is well-documented and self-explanatory.
Parky explained that for a successful test, the vacuum should be held for at least 3 seconds to allow for stabilization. In previous tests, a brief delay before starting the test was necessary to ensure the vacuum or pressure stabilized. Pack tests typically require a 5-7 second hold, while pressure or vacuum vessels may require longer. The duration of the hold may vary depending on customer specifications. If the vacuum does not reach the required level within 3 seconds of opening the valve, it may indicate a sequence failure rather than a test failure. This could be due to misalignment of the cartridge. Automatic timeouts have been included in the sequence to ensure that transitions occur smoothly between states.
I love hands-on challenges like this! Working with an older model like the Panasonic FP0R-C16T will definitely be a unique experience; it will give me a better understanding of the evolution of PLC systems. Also, problem-solving with real world applications is always more effective for learning in my opinion. Sign me up! Just one question though, should we consider upgrading the basic pressure sensor considering it might affect the overall accuracy of the system?
This sounds like a fantastic opportunity for honing PLC programming skills. I'm particularly intrigued by the integration and utilization of different sensors and pneumatic valves. Although the PLC model is outdated, I believe it would still offer valuable, hands-on experience. I'm on board and ready for this challenge! I'm curious though, have you come across any specific obstacles or complications with this setup that we should be aware of?
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - The challenge aims to help participants improve their PLC programming skills by creating a device to detect air leaks in cartridges, serving as a valuable problem-solving exercise.
Answer: - The project utilizes the outdated Panasonic FP0R-C16T PLC model, which has been repurposed for the task at no cost.
Answer: - The key components include cartridge sensor (X1), seal sensor (X2), pressure sensor (X3), pneumatic valves for sealing (Y0) and generating vacuum (Y1), and lights for indicating cartridge quality (Y2 for good cartridge, Y3 for bad cartridge).
Answer: - The system's logic involves sensors detecting the presence of the cartridge, sealing it, generating vacuum, monitoring pressure, and determining the quality of the cartridge based on the readings.
Answer: - Participating in this challenge can provide practical knowledge and hands-on experience in PLC programming, making it a valuable learning opportunity for those involved.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.