Achieving top performance in maintenance and reliability is a crucial component for the success of any company. However, this area can be easily misunderstood. During conversations with maintenance and operations personnel, one common topic is the assessment of maintenance and reliability performance. It is important to consider objective measures such as MTBF, percent emergency work, percent overtime, weeks of backlog, and more. Reflect on your own group and evaluate how you are performing in terms of maintenance and reliability. Identify the objective measures you are currently using and determine if there are additional measures that could be beneficial. Understanding the common objective measures used by professionals in various industries can help you assess and improve your maintenance and reliability performance. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on this topic.
In John Mitchell's book on Physical Asset Management, there is a comprehensive list of Maintenance Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are essential for tracking and improving maintenance practices. By pinpointing and addressing areas of improvement, organizations can lay a strong foundation for effective asset management strategies.
Thank you Josh for your valuable suggestion. Based on your experience, do you think there are certain Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that management prioritizes over others? Additionally, are there specific KPIs that are crucial for hourly personnel to concentrate on?
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) should be viewed as a cohesive set that work together to measure success. Different organizational levels may prioritize different KPIs, which can be aligned from top to bottom or bottom to top in a cascading or rolling up approach. This ensures a comprehensive assessment of performance across all levels of the organization.
When it comes to KPIs, each company will have its own set depending on their maintenance management and organization size. Those with advanced skills tend to focus on performance improvement KPIs, while those with basic skills often stick to common standards. Surprisingly, some industries haven't established KPIs as they primarily rely on reactive maintenance. In my view, the KPIs you mentioned are standard for maintenance and reliability performance. This is just my personal opinion on the matter.
When it comes to management, prioritizing two key performance indicators (KPIs) is crucial for optimal decision-making: plant reliability and maintenance cost trends. These metrics play a vital role in assessing overall efficiency and performance.
I completely agree about the prominence of maintenance and reliability performance in a company's success. In our organization, one of the parameters we use is Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) which has been an insightful measure. It gives a good overview of our equipment's reliability. Besides, we've started tracking our maintenance cost as a percentage of Replacement Asset Value (RAV), which is turning out to be an invaluable metric for assessing maintenance efficiency. Although, we haven't tapped into weeks of backlog or percent emergency work, I believe those could offer deeper insights. Thank you for bringing this up; I will propose adding those to our evaluation matrix.
I couldn't agree more; maintaining performance standards in maintenance and reliability is of utmost importance. On our team, we largely use MTBF and percent overtime as our standard measures. These have indeed proven beneficial in monitoring our performance and planning ahead. However, the idea of incorporating other measures such as weeks of backlog caught my interest. Now I'm thinking maybe we could consider this as an addition to our measuring system, as it could potentially help us understand our pace better and identify if we have any bottlenecks in the pipeline. Thanks for bringing this up.
I completely agree that focusing on objective measures is key to improving maintenance and reliability. In my group, we currently track MTBF and our backlog, which has been helpful for identifying areas needing attention. However, I think we could benefit from analyzing our emergency work percentage more closely since it often indicates deeper systemic issues. It might also be useful to look at equipment downtime and the root causes of each failure to get a more comprehensive view. Sharing insights with other teams could also reveal additional benchmarks we haven't considered yet!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: 1. Why is achieving top performance in maintenance and reliability important for a company? - Achieving top performance in maintenance and reliability is crucial for the success of a company as it ensures operational efficiency, reduces downtime, improves asset lifespan, and ultimately leads to cost savings.
Answer: - Some common objective measures used to assess maintenance and reliability performance include Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), percent emergency work, percent overtime, weeks of backlog, and more.
Answer: - Companies can evaluate their maintenance and reliability performance by reflecting on their own groups, identifying the objective measures they are currently using, and determining if there are additional measures that could be beneficial in assessing and improving performance.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.