I am currently working on implementing a real-time indication system on SCADA to monitor the operation of a pump within its performance curve. This data will eventually be used to evaluate the wire to water efficiency of a hydropneumatic booster in a municipal distribution system. The suction pressure is maintained around 45-50 PSI, while the pumps increase the effective pressure (EFF) to 110 PSI when it drops to 80 PSI. Typically, I would just turn the pumps on without considering pump curves, but now I realize the importance of understanding them better. It seems crucial to observe the difference between suction and discharge pressure in relation to flow, with the delta reflecting a range of numbers from 67 to 74. However, despite my calculations, I am only seeing a boost of about 60-70 PSI at full flow, not the expected range. Although the pumps are able to deliver their full GPM rating to an open hydrant, the EFF pressure remains significantly lower. This prompts the question of whether the pump is operating within its performance curve or if there is a misinterpretation of the data displayed on the chart.
For inquiries like this, visit the enig-tips.com website.
Are you clear on your objective? The series of numbers ranging from 67 to 74 likely represent efficiencies, while the U-shaped contours are known as "iso-efficiencies," indicating the operating points at adjacent efficiencies at the end of each contour. The dotted contours labeled with hp refer to "iso-power" lines - by multiplying the flow by the head and dividing it by the efficiency at the intersection of a power contour and an efficiency contour, you will get consistent results. The vertical axis represents the [discharge minus suction] pressure rise (head) across the pump, while the horizontal axis signifies the flow. Knowing the flow and pressure rise at a given moment determines the operating point, allowing you to derive the power and efficiency from the curve. NPSH, or Net Positive Suction Head, plays a crucial role in preventing cavitation by maintaining the inlet pressure above the liquid's vaporization point. To prevent cavitation, ensure the NPSH is higher than the vapor pressure of the liquid at the pump inlet. For more detailed information, refer to Perry's Handbook. As it has been several years since I last delved into this field regularly, hopefully@Tom Jenkinsor someone more up-to-date can provide further insights or rectify any inaccuracies in my explanation.
When examining the data sheet, it is evident that the pump has a maximum pressure rating of 65.24 psi, equivalent to 150 ft H2O, aligning with the curve lines and your observed discharge pressure of 60-70 PSI. If the goal is to increase the discharge pressure beyond 80 PSI, there may be an issue with the application. Many of us are eagerly anticipating Tom J's input on this matter.
I am hopeful that Tom will also join the discussion. Keeping up with his detailed responses is a challenge, but I remain determined to learn from him. My current project involves analyzing the performance of pump stations in the city. Over the years, the distribution pipelines have changed, impacting the efficiency of the pumps. I am focused on understanding the effects of these changes on the pump curve, as it seems that no one else is paying enough attention to this issue. The pump station I am currently working on is new, and I have meticulously documented its performance. I am particularly interested in ensuring that the pump is operating within the specified parameters. Presently, I have observed a suction pressure of 47psi and a discharge pressure of 110psi, resulting in a boost of 63psi. The flow rate started at 441 GPM at 90psi pressure, but gradually decreased to 254 GPM upon reaching the set pressure of 110psi. By calculating the pressure delta of 63psi and converting it to head, I determined that the pump is operating at a lower flow rate than expected. The data suggests that the pump is not performing optimally, falling short of the expected "System Curve #1." My analysis indicates that there should be a higher flow rate based on the given parameters.
The system curve represents the pressure drops (vertical axis) from the pump discharge pressure to the downstream reservoir pressure at different flow rates (horizontal axis). In contrast, the pump curves show pressure rise, with "0" indicating the pump suction head, typically around 47PSI. The system curve, on the other hand, signifies pressure drop, with "0" being the downstream reservoir pressure where water is delivered. When plotting "System Curve #1," it's assumed that the pump suction pressure and the downstream reservoir pressure are equal. However, if the reservoir pressure is, for example, 110PSI, the starting pressure on the system curve will be higher than the pump suction pressure at zero flow. This means the system curve's starting point won't align with the pump curve's unless the reservoir pressure matches the pump suction pressure. To ensure both the pump and system curves are comparable on the plot's ordinate scale, we may need to adjust the starting point of the system curve relative to the 47PSI pump suction pressure as the reservoir pressure changes. Remember, in this context, "head" and "pressure" are used interchangeably.
It sounds like you're on the right track, but have a few kinks to iron out. One possible explanation could be that there's some significant friction head at full flow, which becomes apparent only under the highest flow conditions. This could potentially explain the lower than expected discharge pressure. Remember, pipe length, diameter, material, and even age can have an impact on friction losses. Another possibility is that your pumps are not delivering their full, expected performance - a common occurrence with aged or inadequately maintained machinery. Be sure to cross-check the manufacturer's spec charts with your real-world readings. Last but not the least, ensuring accurate and consistent pressure readings is essential in making the derived conclusions reliable.
It's great to see your in-depth understanding of pump performance curves and their role in SCADA systems. The disparity in pressure boost might be due to various factors - these could range from mechanical issues such as pump wear or damage, to more procedural problems like inaccurate initial pump curve data or even incorrect system pressure readings. I'd recommend thoroughly inspecting the pump's physical condition and checking the correctness of your base data. Furthermore, factors like your pump's age and the specifics of its maintenance history could be causing it to operate at less than its 'ideal' efficiency, even if the readings suggest it's operating at full GPM. This may explain the inconsistency between the expected EFF pressure boost and what you're currently observing.
Your approach to monitoring the pump's operation within its performance curve is indeed an effective method to understand the pump's efficiency. However, there could be a couple of reasons why you're observing lower boost pressure at full flow. Some plausible reasons could include pump wear, errors in measurement equipment, or presence of air in the system which could affect the pump's performance. It would be also worth verifying whether the performance curve chart corresponds to the exact model and specifications of your pump. It's crucial to remember here that the performance curve is derived under ideal lab conditions, whereas field conditions often involve many variables not taken into account in those settings.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: Answer: Monitoring a pump within its performance curve is essential for ensuring efficient operation, maximizing energy efficiency, and preventing potential issues such as cavitation or overload.
Answer: Answer: The difference between suction and discharge pressure, along with the flow rate, provides valuable information on the pump's efficiency and whether it is operating within its designed parameters.
Answer: Answer: The observed discrepancy could be due to various factors such as incorrect pump selection, system design issues, or misinterpretation of data, highlighting the importance of thorough analysis and troubleshooting.
Answer: Answer: To determine if a pump is operating within its performance curve, it is crucial to compare the actual operating data, including pressure and flow rates, with the manufacturer's pump curve specifications to identify any deviations or inefficiencies.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.