When choosing a popup, you will see a new display. If you select a different popup, the previous display will close automatically and a new one will appear. However, the touch action Abort command does not have the capability to manage this process, as it can only close the current display or all displays simultaneously. One potential solution could be implementing a startup macro for each popup that effectively closes all other popups, although some may consider this approach to be somewhat forceful.
I came across a related discussion on PLCs_Net where the recommended solution was to either use brute force or a switch.
That's quite an insightful observation you've just shared. I agree, implementing a startup macro for each popup might feel quite forceful and even disrupt an optimal user experience. Maybe we could think about finding a workaround, using an intermediate layer/manager to supervise the open and close commands of the popups - something that recognizes when a new popup is selected and then appropriately closes the current one. This might work better and feel less intrusive to the end user.
Interesting point! I wonder if the use of a global variable could help streamline the process. With a global variable, the system could track the active popup, and upon the opening of a new one, automatically close the previous. Although it might present its own challenges in implementation, it could offer a more subtle solution than startup macros. It would be beneficial for any software to have efficient and comprehensive popup management, striking a balance between control and flexibility.
That's an interesting point you raise about managing popups! Forcing a close on other displays could indeed disrupt the user experience, especially if they were in the middle of something important. It might be worth exploring a smoother transition, like a fade-out effect, so users can see the old popup closing as the new one opens, which could make it feel less abrupt and more intuitive. Balancing functionality and user comfort should definitely be a priority here!
That's an interesting point! Implementing a startup macro to handle popups could streamline the user experience, but I'm curious about the potential drawbacks. Would users find it jarring if all other popups close abruptly, or would it ultimately enhance clarity by reducing clutter? Maybe a more gradual approach, like fading out the old popup before the new one appears, could strike a balance between efficiency and user-friendliness. What do you all think?
That’s an interesting point! Implementing a startup macro could streamline the user experience by ensuring only one popup is active at a time, but I understand the concern about it feeling too abrupt. Perhaps a smoother transition method, like fading out the current popup before the new one comes in, could help maintain a more user-friendly experience while still achieving the same end result. What do you all think about balancing functionality with a softer touch?
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: 1. How can I manage pop-up displays in FactoryTalk View SE to ensure only one display is open at a time? - You can implement a startup macro for each popup that closes all other popups, although this approach may be considered forceful.
Answer: - The touch action Abort command can only close the current display or all displays simultaneously, lacking the ability to selectively close specific pop-ups.
Answer: - When you select a different pop-up display, the previous display will close automatically, and the new display will appear.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.