I recall utilizing one of these devices to enhance a control system operating on pneumatic logic gates. We repurposed servo drives and found the indexing motion control to be cost-effective. While it doesn't have the familiar Logix 5xx interface, it was a more budget-friendly option compared to buying a MicroLogix and Rslogix 500, especially since our shop primarily used Logix5000.
Opting for the ML1100 software has been found to be a more cost-effective solution compared to buying both a MicroLogix and an Rslogix 500. The ML1100 software is conveniently available for free on the Rockwell Automation website. Explore more at: http://www.rockwellautomation.com/global/support/plc/micrologix.page.
According to mk42, there is a misconception that the Micro800 PLC is primarily targeted towards the Chinese market and was acquired by AB, rather than being internally developed. While it may not align with the standards of traditional Logix 500/5000 PLCs, this does not necessarily mean it is inferior. Rockwell actually designed the Micro800 and its software. It seems that Rockwell may have compromised their high quality standards in an attempt to break into the low-end PLC market. Despite initial challenges with programming, some users find success with the Micro800, making it a polarizing product within the industry.
Over the past few years, I have extensively utilized the Micro 820, Micro 850, and PanelView 800 series (specifically the 4" model). While early versions of Connected Components Workbench posed challenges, the latest version, CCW V9, has significantly improved its usability. Although I haven't delved into motion control, I have successfully implemented PID, Ethernet/IP connectivity to PowerFlex 525 drives, process control, and programming in various languages such as FBD and ST, with a focus on LAD. Additionally, I have experience in setting up Modbus/TCP communications. Despite some limitations, I find these products satisfactory given their price point. However, when it comes to efficiency and user-friendliness, I prefer RSLogix/Studio 5000 without hesitation.
- 13-08-2024
- brendan.buchan
Is there a shortage of Micro800 products due to high demand? I recently ordered two 7" PanelView800s and was informed of a month-long lead time for shipment from the Rockwell factory. As a newbie to the Micro800 equipment range, I've noticed that the development options for PanelView are somewhat limited. This is understandable given the competitive pricing. While I am not yet fully acquainted with CCWv9, I am finding that it is taking me longer to complete tasks that were previously quicker to accomplish with FactoryTalk View. As I delve into Micro800 programming, I realize that it will require some time to get used to. It's not necessarily difficult, just different from the Rockwell software I am accustomed to.
Last year, I utilized it to automate several small powder coat booths. While the PLC functioned without any issues, the HMI struggled to keep up when I needed to display numerous objects on the screen.
jstolaruk, can you remember which panel series you utilized? While browsing the AB website for panels to find the ideal fit for my needs, I noticed a mention that the "PanelView Component" is being phased out in favor of the PanelView800.
I had been utilizing part number 2711C-T4T with Connected Components Workbench v9.0, but I may have since upgraded from v8.0. It was in conjunction with a ML1400 PLC, not one of the Micro800s.
I usually refrain from commenting on debates between X vs Y PLCs. However, I do believe that Rockwell Automation compromised on their standards to compete in the lower-end market with the MicroLogix series. It would have been better if they had given it a different name, considering it is nothing like the 1100/1400 models. The main drawback I see is the difference in software compared to RsLogix 500 or 5000. Transitioning from one to the other is usually smooth, but the 800 series software poses challenges when upgrading to a larger PLC system. It is important to note that only the 1000 and 1500 models are being phased out, but this is not clearly stated on their website, leading to confusion among users. Visit http://ab.rockwellautomation.com/Programmable-Controllers/MicroLogix-1000 for more information.
When it comes to PLC discussions, TWControls usually prefers to stay out of the X versus Y debates. However, it's hard to ignore the fact that Rockwell Automation made some compromises in terms of standards with their Micro800line to compete in the lower end market. The issue arises with the naming of the product as "MicroLogix", as it bears no resemblance to the 1100/1400 counterparts.
One of the main reasons to discourage the use of the Micro800line is the significant difference in software compared to RsLogix 500 or 5000. Transitioning from 500 to 5000 or vice versa is relatively easy, but the software for the 800 series presents a steep learning curve, especially when moving to a larger PLC family.
It's worth noting that only the 1000 and 1500 models are being phased out, despite common misconceptions. The Micro800line, designed for the Asian small machine OEM market, uses cost-effective software suitable for high-volume production. Unlike the Logix products, it targets a different customer base.
Rockwell Automation's intent with the Micro800line was never to provide a seamless upgrade path to the Logix platform. Instead, they aimed to attract new business opportunities that were previously out of reach. It's possible that we may see a "Logix-Lite" product in the future to fill the gap left by the MicroLogix.
The Micro800line is manufactured by Rockwell Automation in Singapore, underscoring their commitment to quality and control over the production process. While seasoned users of Logix 500/5000 may find the Connected Components Workbench (CCW) software challenging, newcomers or those averse to Logix software may find it simpler to use for basic tasks.
According to jraef, individuals who are new to AB systems or disliked Logix for basic tasks tend to not have many complaints when using the Micro 850. In my experience, customers are satisfied with both the affordability and performance of the hardware.
- 13-08-2024
- Boorabee Parker
Jraef mentioned that the product is not referred to as "MicroLogix", but rather as the Micro800line. The absence of the word "Logix" in its name signifies that it is not a Logix product. The Micro800line is a cost-effective PLC solution targeting the high volume Asian small machine OEM market. While it may not be a Logix product, it serves its purpose well for low volume small machine customers too. The intention behind the creation of the Micro800line was to cater to a new customer base that may not have considered Logix family products. There may be a possibility of a future "Logix-Lite" product to replace the old MicroLogix, allowing compatibility with Studio 5000. Unlike Micro800, an easy migration path to the Logix platform was not part of the original plan. The Micro800line is manufactured by Rockwell Automation in a plant located in Singapore, not China. Users familiar with Logix 500/5000 may find it challenging to transition to CCW, but for those new to AB systems or those who found Logix cumbersome for simple tasks, the Micro800line may be a suitable option.
Firejo brought up the enduring myth surrounding Rockwell's Micro800 PLC, claiming that Rockwell compromised its high quality standards in an attempt to break into the low end PLC market. Despite initial challenges with programming and technical support, some users have grown to appreciate the Micro800 series.
I can relate to Firejo's experience, as I too purchased an 810 hoping for a cost-effective alternative to the ML1100. However, my struggles with programming in CCW v1.0 led me to stick with the ML1100. Despite encountering issues with coding, I still monitor discussions and practice with CCW for potential future use.
Looking for alternatives to the Micro800 series? At my workplace, we have 20 MicroLogix 1000's that need replacing as Rockwell Automation no longer supports them. These PLCs are in separate, unconnected machines performing various tasks. Seeking recommendations for replacements that aren't from RA's Micro800 series. Most of our plant uses RA equipment programmed through Ethernet IP, so sticking with the same brand seems logical. However, if the programming language is a hindrance, it might be worthwhile exploring other options.
If you're looking to upgrade, consider replacing your current models with ML1400s for a long-lasting solution. This switch could save you time and effort in updating your code, allowing for easy copy-and-paste functionality. Say goodbye to frequent replacements for at least the next 15 years with these reliable machines.
Indeed, any cost savings from hardware may be offset by the need to rewrite code, potentially resulting in subpar performance and requiring additional debugging efforts. It is advisable to prioritize saving on the significant initial investment for the application.
The Micrologix 1400 is a reliable and cost-effective option that continues to remain popular in the industrial automation sector. Its versatility makes it ideal for small projects involving legacy equipment. With two RS-232 ports and native RS-485 pins, it offers easy connectivity options. Notably, it excels in Modbus communication, supporting both Modbus RTU on serial ports and Modbus TCP on the Ethernet port.
Compared to the Micro800 series, the 1400 stands out for its user-friendly interface and robust capabilities. Many users find the Micro800 software less intuitive and the hardware less sturdy. For tasks like serving as a Modbus TCP/Ethernet IP gateway or controlling networked drives and servos, the Micrologix 1400 is a top choice due to its reliability and value. Its ease of use in programming differentiates it from other PLC models, making it a highly sought-after solution in the industry.
- 13-08-2024
- FactoryTalktotheHand
Firejo pointed out that the belief that Rockwell's Micro800 PLCs were a success is a persistent myth. The Micro800 was developed by Rockwell, but the software was created by a subsidiary of the company. It seems that Rockwell may have compromised their usual high quality standards in an attempt to gain a foothold in the low-end PLC market. However, this move may have backfired as initial experiences with the Micro800 were challenging, with even Rockwell's tech support struggling to program them effectively. Despite this, there are still users who appreciate the Micro800 line. Some argue that Rockwell's foray into budget PLCs parallels the American auto industry's attempt to compete with Japanese small cars in the 1970s. It's a product that may not have been in high demand, considering the numerous low-end PLC options already available from other manufacturers. Overall, the Micro800 line is likened to the Ford Pinto or the Chevrolet Chevette in the PLC market.
- 13-08-2024
- FactoryTalktotheHand
While using it last year, I utilized automation technology to control small powder coat booths. The PLC portion functioned seamlessly, but I encountered a slow performance with the HMI portion when populating the screen with numerous objects. Could this issue be specific to Panelview Component or Panelview 800s? It's worth noting that Panelview 800s are equipped with a faster processor for improved efficiency.
- 13-08-2024
- FactoryTalktotheHand
In a post by jstolaruk, the part number mentioned was 2711C-T4T while utilizing Connected Components Workbench v9.0. It was likely upgraded from v8.0 at a later time. This was being used with a ML1400, specifically not one of the Micro800s. Stay tuned for my next post regarding the Panelview C400.
In response to jstolaruk's comment about the Panelview C400, I must clarify that it is actually a Panelview Component, not the faster Panelview 800 series. While Panelview 800s are efficient, I personally prefer using a C-More HMI due to its advanced capabilities and comparable price. I reserve Panelview Components for clients loyal to Allen-Bradley who are hesitant to invest in a Panelview Plus.
- 13-08-2024
- FactoryTalktotheHand
The speed of the c400 was sufficient for the task at hand, but the real struggle came with the development software. Creating a screen with numerous graphic components became a tedious process, as each change necessitated a time-consuming update and redraw.
I acknowledge that the ML1400 is likely the optimal choice for my application, but I am curious if there are any other options beyond Rockwell Automation (RA) that have received positive feedback for future considerations.
I had a positive experience with the affordable S7-1200, however, there is room for improvement in the TIA Portal software. The S7-1200 is a cost-effective solution that delivers great performance, while the TIA Portal software could benefit from enhancements to better meet user needs.
Are there any new tips or recommendations for the m800 series? We currently utilize Micrologix 1100/1400 and are considering upgrading to the m800 for cost-effective solutions. While I have experimented with CCW, I prefer working with Micrologix or S7-1200 for their reliability and value.
I prefer the 820 for small projects and the 850 for larger ones. The software keeps improving with each update, making it even more versatile and efficient.
- 13-08-2024
- geniusintraining
Don't overlook the latest Micro870 model in your rush! Check out the brand new Micro870 Programmable Controllers from Rockwell Automation at http://ab.rockwellautomation.com/Programmable-Controllers/Micro870.
Upon first inspection, the user interface appears cumbersome and may lead to frustration, lacking the user-friendly experience of RS Logix. This software provides Rockwell users with the chance to explore alternative PLC brands suitable for smaller projects. Transitioning from Logix to Automation Direct seems to offer a smoother learning curve compared to switching to CCW.
Geospark excitedly shared the latest addition to their product lineup: the brand new Micro870 programmable controller. Find more information about the Micro870 on Rockwell Automation's website. Will the Micro870 be compatible with the 850 expansion I/O, or will it have its own unique line? Only time will tell!
- 13-08-2024
- geniusintraining
Despite facing criticism, I highly recommend giving the Idec FC6A a try for your small projects. This programmable controller is user-friendly, packed with intuitive features, and comes with complimentary support at an affordable price point. For even smaller tasks, consider experimenting with the FL1A Smart relay, which boasts software created by Siemens.
Jaden expressed disappointment in the initial impression of the programming software, comparing it to RS Logix. However, it may offer Rockwell users a chance to explore other brands for smaller PLCs. The software may appear simplistic, almost child-like, rather than professional. Despite this, there have been improvements in its features since the initial launch. It seems to be a whole new platform compared to Logix CPUs.
Geniusintraining pondered whether the software will use the 850 expansion I/O or have its own line based on its appearance in pictures.
John Morris suggested trying the Idec FC6A or the FL1A Smart relay for smaller projects, with the latter possibly being similar to Siemens' LOGO!. The software for the FL1A was developed by Siemens, raising questions about the hardware manufacturer. Despite differences from traditional PLCs, the Ethernet functionality in these systems is notable, even for smaller applications.
mk42 mentioned that the initial version of the programming software looked more suitable for a child learning programming rather than for professionals. It has since improved significantly, with a more polished and professional appearance. The evolution of software often involves many changes and updates. TIA Portal 9.5 had its flaws, such as frequent blue screen errors, but version 14/15 shows vast improvements. Early versions of Click software faced numerous download-related issues, underscoring the importance of waiting for more refined iterations before making a purchase.
- 13-08-2024
- geniusintraining
As someone in the process of mastering new software, I can attest that continuous improvement is key. It's common for any new software to undergo numerous changes over its lifecycle. When TIA Portal 9.5 was released, it faced issues like the dreaded blue screen of death. However, versions 14/15 are much more stable and reliable. The initial release of Click software also encountered program issues post-download, causing significant frustration. Remember, it's often wise to wait on purchasing new products as early versions may have unforeseen issues. So, does the software still look the same? My earlier critique focused on surface-level details.
I prioritize functionality and user-friendliness over aesthetics when it comes to software. The design is not as important to me as how intuitive and easy it is to navigate and accomplish tasks. Check out the example below - I believe it serves its purpose effectively.
- 13-08-2024
- geniusintraining
It seems that the Easy Soft PRO software for Eaton Smart Relays is no longer in use.
In a more leisurely manner, the conversation between geniusintraining and mk42 revolved around the potential usage of the 850 expansion I/O in the Micro870 controller. While the physical appearance may seem similar, the Micro870 actually supports the same 2080- Plug-in Modules and 2085- Expansion I/O Modules as the Micro850, but with some differences in specifications.
The Micro850 controller can support up to 5 Plug-in Modules, whereas the Micro870 can support up to 3. In terms of Expansion I/O Modules, the Micro850 supports up to 4 while the Micro870 supports up to 8. Additionally, the Micro870 boasts higher capacities in terms of Digital I/O, instruction count, data size, and High Speed Counters.
Currently, the Micro870 has two released models, with more expected in the future. Meanwhile, the Micro850 has models that offer more Embedded I/O options.
Furthermore, the upcoming CCW v11 update will bring various enhancements to both Micro800 controller families, including Online Editing capabilities and support for Floating Point 32-bit & 64-bit data types.
For a detailed assessment of the Micro800 family of controllers, you can visit the link provided. Stay tuned for more updates and advancements in these versatile controllers.
I often find myself in need of 64-bit floating point capabilities, especially last week.
Geospark mentioned: "I am aware of that." Upon further investigation, I received the same information from our distributor. Currently, we are utilizing PV800 alongside the Micrologix and have no plans to switch due to its cost-effectiveness and completion of our HMI applications. Therefore, we prefer not to introduce other controllers. I anticipate a smooth transition of tags from the Micrologix to the m800. Thank you for your responses; I am hesitant to dismiss the m800. Hopefully, the new CCW v11 will offer a more intuitive user experience, or perhaps I will become more accustomed to it.
*bj said: I received confirmation from our distributor as well. Our Rockwell Account Manager is scheduled to meet with me tomorrow to update me on the latest offerings. I plan to inquire further about the Micro870 and any additional information they may have. Initially, he seemed confident about sharing updates, but during our conversation, it became apparent that I was already well-informed about many aspects. Consequently, he will be accompanied by a "Specialist" for our meeting. I am curious to see how "special" their expertise truly is once I engage with them. Rest assured, I will approach the discussion with tact. Additionally, I enjoy the South African accent of our Account Manager, even if my attention tends to wander at times. G.
In my opinion, RSLogix 500 is my preferred choice over the 800 series. While the micro800 line has its merits and the CCW software has made significant improvements since its early days, there are still some areas that can be frustrating, such as how timers function and the limitations on bit access in DINT, INT, etc. Despite these challenges, I have found workarounds by creating function blocks to mimic RSLogix's functionality. My Rockwell representative hinted at the possibility of phasing out the 500 line, citing cost and the availability of conversion catalogs and software for transitioning from 500 to 800. I am eagerly anticipating the release of V11 to see what new features it offers.
There seems to be some confusion about the future of the SLCs being replaced by the 800 series PLCs. In reality, the 800 series PLCs are actually replacing the MicroLogix models 1000-1500. While the SLCs are being phased out, they are being replaced by the Compactlogix. So next time your sales rep mentions this transition, be sure to ask them if they have something in their eye.
- 13-08-2024
- geniusintraining
It has been confirmed through an official notice that the Micrologix 1100 and 1400 will remain available for at least the next seven years. This announcement was made approximately six months ago.
According to an official notice, the Micrologix 1100 and 1400 will remain available for at least the next seven years. This update was received approximately six months ago. Hopefully, by the time these products are retired, I will be enjoying my retirement.
- 13-08-2024
- geniusintraining
A user on geniusintraining forum expressed uncertainty over the rumor of 800 series controllers replacing SLCs, stating that they are actually replacing MicroLogix models 1000-1500. The SLCs are being phased out but will be substituted by Compactlogix. Next time your sales representative hints at something, be sure to inquire about their intentions. It was a slip of the tongue to mention the '500' series, as the reference was to devices utilizing RSLogix 500 like the Micro 1000 series.
Rson acknowledged making a mistake by referring to the '500' series instead of devices using RSLogix 500 like the Micro 1000 series. Don't worry, and welcome to the forum! One thing is certain around here - if you misspeak, you will be challenged or corrected. Join the discussion on RSLogix 500 devices and the Micro 1000 series here at the forum.
- 13-08-2024
- geniusintraining
Greetings! I am a newcomer to Allen Bradley, starting my journey with the Micro850 controller using CCW V12. Although I have experience in programming with Siemens, Mitsubishi, and Omron, my initial impression of the software was that it appeared overly simplistic and amateurish. Unfortunately, the software encountered issues after Windows security updates, necessitating daily removal of the updates.
As I delved into programming, I found the software to be quite intuitive. The Developer version of CCW provided me with all the necessary tools for my project. With the flexibility to code in Ladder, Function Blocks, and Structured Text, everything fell into place seamlessly. The system has been operational for three months now, and I have not received any complaints from the client.
I am confident in the quality of the product and excited for future developments to come.
The Micro 850 and 870 modules are known for their powerful network connectivity capabilities, making them ideal for various applications, including OEM projects. Those familiar with typing command strings will find programming these modules to be effortless. It is recommended to use the direct text editing feature in CCW to write logic efficiently. With the latest release, users can customize naming conventions to match Logix standards, allowing for seamless code transfer between CCW, 5000, and vice versa. Enhancements in data sharing between control logix and micro850 modules could potentially make them a cost-effective and versatile IO solution for the control logix family.
My initial encounter with a Micro 800 Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) was about five years ago and it was a challenging experience due to the slow programming interface. However, in the past year, I have had the opportunity to work on projects involving this PLC family and have noticed significant improvements in Connected Components Workbench (CCW). I appreciate the easier communication setup via ethernet and the various libraries available from the community.
CCW can be likened to the younger sibling of Studio5000. One drawback for those hesitant to purchase the CCW license is that the free version does not allow for online changes, requiring a machine stoppage for any updates to be made.
Tim Wilborne noted that he discourages the use of CCW mainly because its software differs greatly from RsLogix 500 or 5000. If someone is familiar with 500, they can quickly adapt to 5000 and vice versa. However, transitioning to a larger PLC family from the 800 series can be challenging when the application outgrows it. With the recent updates in the CCW software, particularly in Version 12, such as the Logix Theme, transitioning between CCW and Studio 5000 has become much smoother and user-friendly.
Hey Tim, I'm a big fan of your YouTube content, it's incredibly informative. I recently started exploring the micro800 family after working with numerous MicroLogix PLCs. My programming heavily relies on "bit" relays like B3:0/0 for logic steps. I've noticed that your videos don't touch on how the micro800 line handles bit relays in RSLogix 500. I'm hesitant to try converting my RSLogix 500 programs to Micro800, as I anticipate encountering errors due to the abundance of B3:* in my older programs. Are there any workarounds for this issue in the Micro800 system? Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Splicer480.
Thank you for the kind words regarding my videos. One thing that should be mentioned is the method of creating an INT array tag named B3 and manipulating the addresses. However, I strongly urge against this practice. In RsLogix 500, B3:3/6 may have represented the Cycle Running bit, indicated by labeling it as "Cycle Running." In contrast, the Micro800 uses tag-based addresses, allowing us to use a clearer BOOL tag named Cycle_Running instead of B3:3/6. If you prefer to stick with the B3 format for ease of conversion, the address would then be B3[3].6.
During the process of migrating from an outdated platform to a more advanced one, I ensure to retain the old address information in the description of the new tag. For instance, if the address B3:3/6 in the MicroLogix was labeled as "Cycle_Running", I would create a boolean tag with the same name in the Micro800 PLC. In the tag's description, I would also mention its previous address as "Was B3:3/6". This practice helps in maintaining continuity and clarity during the transition process.
When transitioning from an older platform to a new one, I make sure to retain the old address information in the description of the new tag. For instance, if the address B3:3/6 in the MicroLogix was labeled as "Cycle_Running," I would create a boolean tag with the same name in the Micro800 and include "Was B3:3/6" in the tag's description. This approach ensures a smooth conversion process and maintains consistency in tag naming conventions. Follow this helpful advice for efficient platform migration.
Thank you for the responses, gentlemen. I will test this out in the simulator to see how it works.
In the opinion of a software developer, the Micro800 by Rockwell Automation may seem like a rebranded product from a lesser-known PLC manufacturer, labeled as the "Next Gen MicroLogix". The software interface is cumbersome, and the documentation is inadequate. While the price of the hardware may be enticing, the software's limitations often result in additional labor costs to make it function properly. Integrating the Micro800 with a ControlLogix system on the same network can be a challenge. Avoid the headaches and frustrations by investing in more reliable options.
- 13-08-2024
- Ride_Husqvarna
According to Ride_Husqvarna, the Micro800 PLC from Rockwell Automation may seem like a rebranded version of a smaller Asian or European PLC, marketed as the "Next Gen MicroLogix." The software is described as clumsy, with poor documentation and labeling. While the hardware cost savings may be appealing, system integrators may find themselves investing more time and effort to make the PLC function properly. Interfacing with a ControlLogix on the same Ethernet network can also present challenges. Despite attempts to phase out the Micro800, it remains an essential tool that fulfills its requirements effectively. In comparison, the new Micro800 does not offer any significant advantages for this particular PLC category. It might be wise to reconsider investing in this product and exploring better alternatives.
In the realm of programmable logic controllers, some individuals believe that the Micro800 by Rockwell Automation resembles a product from a lesser-known PLC manufacturer, embellished with inexpensive branding before being marketed as the "Next Gen MicroLogix." However, it is important to note that the Micro800 is a Rockwell Automation creation, from its hardware to its software, which is based on ISaGRAF. Despite criticisms that place the Micro800 at the bottom tier of Rockwell Automation's offerings, it is essential to acknowledge that Rockwell Automation takes full responsibility for both the success and shortcomings of the product. The perception that the Micro800 is a re-branded product is debunked by industry experts who confirm that Rockwell Automation developed the Micro800 and its accompanying software. Its design and functionality cater to the demand for affordable, low-end PLCs rather than aiming to replace the MicroLogix series. This clarifies that the Micro800 was not intended to fill the shoes of the MicroLogix and should not be judged based on that criterion.
According to plvlce, Rockwell is responsible for the hardware development and production, while the software appears to be rooted in ISaGRAF, which Rockwell acquired in 2007. As Ken Roach mentioned earlier and Firejo reiterated, these PLCs may give off a cheap, low-end impression because they were originally designed for that market. If they are being positioned as replacements for MicroLogix, it may not align with their intended purpose. There seems to be a disconnect between Rockwell's history of acquiring companies for their technology and branding it as their own, as seen with the new optix panels and software. It will be interesting to see how these products evolve over time and if Rockwell will eventually claim to have developed them from scratch.
plvlce mentioned that the hardware of these PLCs is developed and built by Rockwell, while the software is based on ISaGRAF, which has been a part of Rockwell since 2007. As stated by Ken Roach and Firejo in previous discussions, these PLCs may appear to be low-end and affordable because they were designed for that specific market. However, they have proven to be reliable in the Oil & Gas Industry, even in remote locations. Over the past decade, the Micro800 series has been utilized extensively with minimal replacements, mostly due to lightning damage. The developer edition of the software has facilitated programming in Ladder & Structured Text for various applications, including P.I.D. control and Pump Off Control (POC). These PLCs are considered "Smart Edge of Network" devices, connecting to the Scada Server and transmitting a high volume of tags daily using Mqtt Sparkplug B protocol. Despite having experience with other PLC brands like Siemens, Do-More (BRX), and IDEC, the Micro800 series and CCW remain the preferred choice for their reliability and versatility.
Are you new to PLC programming and looking for an affordable option to learn modern software using Structured Text and named variables? Look no further than the Micro 800 series. With the Micro 820 available for purchase on eBay at a reasonable price, this is a great opportunity to dive into the world of PLC programming without breaking the bank.
The Micro800 series offers reliability and versatility in the Oil & Gas Industry, even in remote locations. With robust hardware and user-friendly software, it supports various automation tasks like P.I.D. control and Pump off control. Additionally, it seamlessly integrates into edge networks using Mqtt Sparkplug B. While some may view it as not living up to the Logix family standard, it has proven to be a top choice for users like Old Man with its exceptional performance and durability. It may not cater to everyone's expectations, but it excels in meeting the needs of its target market.