New ✨ Introducing Oxmaint Asset Hub for Machine Builders and OEMs. Explore Now
This recent partnership between MRO Software Inc. and Ivara Corporation is a major development in the marketplace, making it one of the most significant collaborations I've seen in the past 18 months to two years. The announcement was made in Orlando, Florida and Burlington, Ontario, as reported on Business Wire. This partnership signifies Ivara's participation in the MRO Software Complementary Solution Partner program, further solidifying their position as an industry leader in asset reliability solutions. Share your thoughts on this partnership by visiting the link: http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.j...25005741&newsLang=en.
Could it be that a CMMS provider has at last realized the importance of reliability? -Terry O Improved, SEO-friendly Text: Is it possible that a CMMS company has recognized the significance of reliability? Terry O
"Be bold like Terry and reel in those crabs with your enticing bait!"
Terry, that's the exact reason why this is such a significant issue. We're not just talking about any CMMS company here - we're talking about one with a huge global presence. This is a major development that can't be overlooked.
While Meridium had previously offered similar functionalities to CMMS, I am curious to explore the capabilities of Ivara software in terms of reliability analysis. It would be beneficial to understand the various types of analyses it can perform.
The landscape of maintenance is undergoing a transformation, with a shift in focus on CMMS and reliability. While opinions may vary on whether CMMS or reliability should take the lead, it is evident that both are essential components that need to work in tandem for effective maintenance strategies. Regards, Steve from OMCS International.
I believe that both are essential. For instance, one popular CMMS features a Plant Maintenance Information System (PMIS) section, offering standard analyses like object statistics, breakdown analysis, and cost analysis. Users can also customize their analyses to meet their specific needs.
A recent survey revealed that over 70% of respondents rely on custom-built applications such as Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, Acrobat) to support their reliability programs. Additionally, there was mention of humor regarding the early version of Microsoft's Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) software for Windows in a separate discussion.
The upgrade from Microsoft V1 to PostItNotes V7 showed a significant improvement. A discussion filled with humor emerged on a different platform revolving around the drawbacks of using PostItNotes. One user shared their experience of data loss when a gust of wind blew open a door. - Steve
I am highly impressed by Microsoft's remarkable ability to seamlessly integrate tools that everyday users rely on to showcase their creativity. An example shared in a popular online forum highlighted how participants submitted reports in various styles and colors, showcasing the unmatched flexibility offered by Microsoft (as well as a few other innovative companies). This level of integration and user-friendly options is a rare find in the tech industry.
Several issues are at play here: 1) Historically, many CMMS/EAM vendors have lacked understanding of the processes they automate, except for those who have a clear understanding of the industry. 2) The key to reliability does not solely rely on software solutions like CMMS/EAM or specialized programs such as Ivara EXP or Meridium. The focus should be on establishing effective processes, with technology serving as a valuable tool rather than a cure-all. 3) Meridium offers RCMO (Reliability Centered Maintenance Optimization) software for SAP-PM/EAM as an official SAP "Partner". 4) Both Meridium and Ivara collaborate with various CMMS/EAM systems, with recent partnerships with MRO and SAP being more about marketing than anything else. 5) These collaborations signify a growing awareness and interest in the maintenance and reliability sector, particularly with major players like SAP and Oracle making moves into the industry. 6) It's promising for the maintenance and reliability field that industry giants such as SAP and Oracle are expressing interest and gaining influence in this space, potentially impacting decision-makers at all levels of organizations. Your company's executives may value their conversations with SAP/Oracle executives more than their discussions with you on EAM and reliability strategies. These developments highlight the evolving landscape of the industry.
Terry, it's time for Bingo fun! Join us now for an exciting game of Bingo. Let's start marking those numbers and aiming for the big win!
At present, I am heavily involved in this market and upon reviewing this specific deal, I find it to be different from the typical RCMO engagements I am familiar with. This deal originates from Maximo, rather than SAP, which is significant considering SAP's limited focus on the AM sector despite recent developments in Europe. The emphasis here is not on software, but rather on thoughtware and leveraging the expertise of individuals to drive reliability initiatives forward. It is worth noting that Ivara, the owners of Aladon, coined the term "thoughtware" in our industry. This partnership between a leading CMMS creator with a strong market presence and a company holding the intellectual property developed under MOubray's guidance is a noteworthy development. Despite Oracle's absence in the markets I operate in, as well as the lack of visibility of smaller systems, this collaboration holds substantial potential. In conclusion, the union between these two entities opens up avenues for discussions on EAM and reliability, previously overlooked in favor of ERP-related conversations. It is frustrating to observe how executives may place more trust in SAP/Oracle counterparts, undermining internal expertise and knowledge within the organization.
Hey everyone, I want to clarify that I mentioned "within the last 18 months to two years," not at any point in history. Thank you!
IBM has recently acquired MRO Software in a deal worth $740 million. What are your thoughts on this acquisition by IBM? Share your opinions on IBM's purchase of MRO Software. Terry O.
I'm truly impressed and pleasantly surprised. It's tricky to declare something as incredibly significant because it sets a high bar for future developments. In my interactions with IBM consultants, they firmly believe they are the global leaders in transformative management consulting, a claim that's hard to dispute. The recent acquisition of MRO software at a premium price is a clear indicator of IBM's and Maximo's aggressive foray into the asset-intensive industry sector. I have my theories about the rationale behind this move. I'm eagerly anticipating what unfolds next and how the landscape will evolve over the next 18 months.
After acquiring MRO (Maximo), what is IBM's next move? Will Microsoft follow suit by purchasing Datastream from SAP AG?
I find it surprising that Microsoft has not yet entered the CMMS and Asset Management systems market, given their capabilities. While it may not be their typical mass market focus, developing such systems seems well within their expertise. If they decide to enter this market, they could potentially disrupt and dominate over smaller and larger companies.
Is Microsoft really considering acquiring SAP? It seems unlikely, as SAP is typically associated with high-end corporations rather than the average consumer. In my opinion, MP2 would be a more suitable target for Microsoft's acquisition strategy. Can you remember which office programs were available before the launch of MS Office 1.0?
I utilized the DOS application Wordstar on an Apple IIe computer, operated by Terry O.
Could IBM be considering acquiring Ivara as well? Ivara, a privately owned company, may be a cost-effective option in comparison to MRO acquisitions.
This offer presents an excellent opportunity for IBM ...
Inquiring minds may be curious about the predecessors to MS Office 1.0. Before Excel came onto the scene, many users were familiar with Lotus 123 and Symphony. WordStar was not as well-received. And let's not forget the renowned (or perhaps notorious) Dbase III before the advent of MS Access.
In addition to DBase, users often turned to Paradox as an alternative, while Quattro Pro served as a replacement for Lotus 123. My first word processing experience was with WordStar, followed by Wordperfect 4.0.
The Lotus Suite offered a variety of applications, although the specifics (apart from 123) escape memory, bundled together before Microsoft dominated the market and pushed Lotus out.
In 1997, there were three widely accepted popular office suites globally: Corel Perfect Office featuring WordPerfect, Quattro Pro, and CorelDraw; Microsoft Office, which remains a powerhouse; and Lotus SmartSuite with 123 and WordPro. Lotus made significant investments in email applications, partnering with IBM to develop Lotus Notes as a competitor to Microsoft Exchange Server. Corel, on the other hand, focused on establishing a strong presence in graphic design applications.
Answer: - The partnership signifies Ivara's participation in the MRO Software Complementary Solution Partner program, strengthening their position as industry leaders in asset reliability solutions.
Answer: - The announcement was made in Orlando, Florida, and Burlington, Ontario, as reported on Business Wire.
Answer: - This partnership is considered one of the most significant collaborations in the industry during that timeframe.
Answer: - You can visit the link provided in the thread for more details on this partnership: http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.j...25005741&newsLang=en.