I am curious to know the most effective method for documenting completed work or inspections in a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). Should the tradesmen who performed the work input the details directly into the CMMS, or should a data entry specialist transfer the information from manually filled out task lists? This approach aims to streamline the process and maximize the tradesmen's productivity. Which method do you believe is more efficient and beneficial for increasing "tool time"?
By utilizing Clerks for data entry tasks, we are able to streamline operations and free up technicians for more specialized tasks that leverage their expertise. Rather than wasting technicians' time on data entry, which some may struggle with due to limited typing skills, consider training them on utilizing our CMMS. This will not only empower them to efficiently close maintenance orders but also familiarize them with other functionalities of the system. By assigning technicians responsibilities such as searching and printing maintenance orders, accessing equipment records, and managing paperwork, we ensure a more efficient workflow. Hiring clerks with strong document handling and data entry skills to handle administrative tasks at the Planning Offices allows our technicians to focus on fieldwork, planning, and other responsibilities that require their expertise. It is essential to hire the right individuals for each specific role to optimize productivity and performance.
In my opinion, it is beneficial for technicians and foremen to handle the closing processes in order to familiarize themselves with the CMMS system and utilize it effectively. Having a dedicated clerk can lead to conflicts over job responsibilities and prioritization. As technology has evolved, personal secretaries have been replaced by computers, reducing the need for clerical staff in hierarchical structures. Providing technicians with access to the CMMS system eliminates the need for manual record-keeping and ensures information is readily available. It is essential to equip technicians with the necessary tools to streamline their work processes and prevent unnecessary delays in equipment maintenance.
I recognize the importance of increasing tool time, however, I believe that adopting svanel's perspective can lead to superior outcomes in the long run. It is essential for technicians to directly engage with a CMMS in order to develop the necessary skills for analyzing machine history and making the most of its various features. In my experience, individuals with limited computer proficiency tend to only perform the basic tasks, while those with stronger computer skills and a keen interest in understanding the CMMS operate at a more advanced level and reap its rewards. Technicians who recognize how the CMMS can simplify their job tend to gravitate towards the more skilled individuals and learn from them. Conversely, those lacking motivation and curiosity often remain stagnant, only completing the bare minimum.
When it comes to work orders, it's important to differentiate between complete and close statuses. I often advise technicians to mark a task as "DONE" before marking it as complete, to ensure that supervisors can review and approve updates. While clerical input can be helpful, a mobile solution is ultimately the best option to prevent data from being lost. It's crucial to track failure data as it cannot be easily extracted from text fields. For a more in-depth look at failure analysis, I recommend checking out the TRM website for practical insights.
In my experience, I've found that using a hybrid approach boosts productivity without compromising the quality of information being stored in the CMMS. Instead of tradesmen spending valuable time navigating complex CMMS interfaces, they could log essential details of completed jobs onto a simple digitized template or app. This way, the majority of the data entry burden moves to the data entry specialist who transfers the information from the digitized templates to the CMMS. At the same time, tradesmen would still be directly involved in the documentation process to guarantee accuracy and completeness of the information. This split in responsibilities allows for an increase in tool time, while ensuring a comprehensive and accurate CMMS data management.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - Tradesmen inputting completed work directly into a CMMS can provide real-time data, reduce the chances of errors during data transfer, and increase accountability for the work performed.
Answer: - Having a data entry specialist transfer information from manually filled out task lists can ensure consistency in data entry format, free up tradesmen's time for other tasks, and allow for a more standardized approach to documentation.
Answer: - The effectiveness of each method may vary depending on the organization's specific workflow and resources. Direct input by tradesmen may be more efficient for maximizing "tool time" if the CMMS interface is user-friendly and tradesmen are trained adequately. On the other hand, data entry by a specialist can be beneficial in ensuring data accuracy and freeing up tradesmen for hands-on tasks.
Answer: - To determine the most suitable method for optimizing documentation in a CMMS, organizations can conduct a pilot test of both approaches, gather feedback from tradesmen and data entry specialists, analyze the efficiency and accuracy of each method, and consider factors
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.