Optimizing Maintenance Time Tracking with T-code CATS

Question:

Have you had experience using Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) for tracking maintenance time? Our technicians currently utilize IW41, IW44, and IW48 to directly record maintenance activities on work orders. However, the Workload Analysis tool may not accurately capture all time spent as it only records wrench and repair time.

Top Replies

Are you referring to CATS, which stands for Cross Application Timesheet? I have been actively involved in its implementation process.

We utilize a CATS system for tracking time, which functions effectively. Do you have any particular inquiries or concerns?

I am currently studying and testing on my own to configure HR processes, but I am finding it challenging to learn without assistance. I have reached out to an ICT company for help, but they are currently occupied with other projects. Could you please provide me with step-by-step guidance on configuring HR processes? The HR Division is not fully implemented at the moment, and I need to accurately record and manage both internal staff and external (outsourced) personnel for maintenance purposes.

Apologies for the delay in response. Providing step-by-step configuration instructions for your query on this forum may be challenging. While I have a good understanding of the rationale behind our current configuration, I may not have specific details on the exact steps involved.

Of course, seigga813, no need to worry about that. Can you provide me with a concise guide on configuring CATS?

I've been using CMMS for some years now and I agree that it often misses certain aspects of maintenance time. While it excels at tracking wrench and repair time, it doesn't fully account for aspects like administrative work, logistics, preparation, or unforeseen issues encountered during repair. It's great for getting a straightforward snapshot of workload, but for a more holistic view of your technicians' time, you may need to supplement it with additional tracking or adjust how the tool is used. Adjustments could include adding more specific categories to more accurately capture all the nuances of the work being done.

Yes, our firm has indeed utilized CMMS to track maintenance activities, and we found it certainly has its pros and cons. In my experience, if you're using a tool like the Workload Analysis you've mentioned, it's incredibly important to make sure your team is appropriately trained on identifying and recording all types of maintenance-related activities. The time spent on diagnostics, discussion, planning, and even cleanup after a job can significantly add up, which won't be represented if your technicians are merely logging 'wrench-time'. However, the CMMS is only as good as the data being input, thus ensuring comprehensive entries by your technicians should significantly improve accuracy.

Absolutely, I have experience using CMMS and I understand your concern. Aside from standard wrench and repair time, a lot of other tasks can eat into a technician's day - be it troubleshooting, preparation time or indirect tasks like documentation. One solution could be to incorporate a broader categorization for time-tracking in your CMMS, like including categories for logistic, administrative and preparatory tasks. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of technician workload. It's not a catch-all solution, but it definitely provides a more accurate picture compared to only logging wrench time.

Yes, I have experience using CMMS. It's true that IW41, IW44, and IW48 capture basic maintenance activities, but they might miss out on "hidden times", like setup, cleanup, and travel between jobs. When these tasks are considered, the overall maintenance time could increase significantly. One way to address this is to build categories for these hidden tasks into your CMMS, ensuring your techs record these times along with their direct repair time. Also, regular training and reinforcement of the importance of capturing complete work time can improve the accuracy of data entry. Don't forget to adjust your workload analysis tool accordingly!

I totally understand your concerns about the limitations of the Workload Analysis tool; it can be frustrating when the data doesn't reflect the complete picture of maintenance activities. One approach I've found helpful is to incorporate regular follow-ups with technicians to gather insights on unrecorded tasks or downtime, as this can provide a clearer understanding of overall time spent. Additionally, exploring integrations with other reporting tools might help capture a fuller scope of maintenance efforts, beyond just wrench time. This way, you can ensure your metrics are more comprehensive and reflective of the team's actual workload.

I’ve worked with CMMS in the past, and it’s true that tools like IW41, IW44, and IW48 are great for logging specifics, but I’ve found that they can miss out on capturing the total maintenance time, especially for activities that aren’t directly tied to wrench time. Integrating features that account for planning, downtime, or any non-productive time could really help provide a clearer picture of our maintenance efficiency. Have you considered customizing your reports or using additional KPIs to monitor the full scope of maintenance activities?

More Replies →

Streamline Your Asset Management
See How Oxmaint Works!!

✅   Work Order Management

✅   Asset Tracking

✅   Preventive Maintenance

✅   Inspection Report

We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.

To add a comment, please sign in or register if you haven't already..   

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

FAQ: 1. How can Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) help in tracking maintenance time?

Answer: Answer: CMMS helps in tracking maintenance time by allowing technicians to directly record maintenance activities on work orders, providing a more accurate overview of time spent on different tasks.

FAQ: 2. What are some common challenges faced when tracking maintenance time using tools like IW41, IW44, and IW48?

Answer: Answer: One common challenge is that these tools may not accurately capture all time spent as they mainly focus on wrench and repair time, potentially missing out on other important maintenance activities.

FAQ: 3. How can the Workload Analysis tool be optimized to capture all time spent on maintenance tasks?

Answer: Answer: To improve accuracy, consider integrating additional data points or fields in the Workload Analysis tool to capture a broader range of maintenance activities beyond just wrench and repair time. This can provide a more comprehensive view of maintenance time tracking.

Ready to Simplify Maintenance?

Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.

Request Demo  â†’