Do you have a policy in place for tracking motor history and maintenance? Consider setting a cutoff for motors that are 15 horsepower or below. Instead of tracking these smaller motors, prioritize keeping spare parts on hand and conducting regular inventory checks. This approach can save time and resources, especially since smaller motors are often discarded rather than rewound if they become damaged. Focus on maintaining detailed records and tracking for larger motors to ensure optimal performance and longevity.
When it comes to small motor maintenance, a run-to-failure strategy can be implemented, distinguishing between intentional and unintentional breakdowns. It is essential to clearly outline this in the maintenance strategy document and maintain a list of small motors. Having a price agreement in place with the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) is crucial to ensure immediate replacement purchases when needed, minimizing stocking requirements. Maintenance records for larger motors should be meticulously documented either in a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) or paper files for easy access and reference.
Hello everyone, it's been a while since I last visited. When deciding whether to prioritize tracking motor history, it's important to consider the motor's impact on your system, not just its size. Both small and large motors have the potential to cause significant system failures. Focus on preventing unexpected critical failures by listing every motor in your facility, assessing their criticality, and evaluating their impact on production. I recommend evaluating the overall criticality of systems to your production mission first, followed by the criticality of equipment to the system. I personally use a spreadsheet to do this, assessing systems against 11 criteria including Health, Safety & Environment, Production, Schedule & Revenue, and Likelihood. Equipment criticality is rated using a simpler 3-criteria RPN. Once you have all the information, organize the results by system criticality and equipment criticality to create a comprehensive motor tracking list. Having a well-organized spreadsheet will greatly assist in this process. These are my thoughts on the matter.
Great point! The cost effectiveness of tracking smaller motors versus simply having spares on hand is indeed a strategy worth considering. Just to add, another factor to keep in mind is the vital role these smaller motors play in your operation. If they're critical to your business, a failure can result in significant downtime, so regular inspections and preemptive replacement might be a better approach. Definitely agree that meticulous record-keeping for the larger, more costly motors is a must for predicting maintenance needs and extending motor life.
I completely agree with prioritizing inventory checks for smaller motors. In my experience, a meticulous inventory can reduce downtime significantly, as having spare parts on hand allows for quicker replacements. That said, for larger motors, a comprehensive history and maintenance tracking system is imperative. Not only does it enhance the longevity, but also, the efficiency of these engines is greatly improved by preventing potential breakdowns.
I completely agree with your approach! Smaller motors definitely seem to be more of a hassle than they're worth when it comes to tracking. By prioritizing spare parts and regular inventory checks for these units, we can streamline our processes significantly. It makes much more sense to focus on maintaining detailed records for the larger motors, which tend to require more attention for longevity. A solid policy that balances both types will not only optimize our resources but also enhance our overall efficiency.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: 1. Why should we prioritize spare parts and inventory control for smaller motors? - Prioritizing spare parts and inventory control for smaller motors can save time and resources, as these motors are often discarded rather than rewound if damaged. This approach ensures that necessary parts are readily available and helps in efficient maintenance.
Answer: - It is recommended to focus on maintaining detailed records and tracking for larger motors to ensure optimal performance and longevity. Setting a cutoff for motors that are 15 horsepower or below can also help in determining which motors to track closely and which ones to prioritize spare parts for.
Answer: - Regular inventory checks help in ensuring that the necessary spare parts are available when needed, thus reducing downtime. It also aids in identifying any potential issues or shortages in inventory, allowing for timely restocking and efficient maintenance practices.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.