Greetings everyone, I am currently engaged in a project focused on effectively managing reactive power distribution between inverters and a VAR Generator. Here is an overview of the situation at hand: System Overview: - Reactive Power Setpoint: The setpoint is received from the grid operator. - Inverters: Each inverter has a specified capacity and can utilize up to 60% of this capacity for reactive power. The number of operational inverters can vary. - VAR Generator: With a higher capacity, the VAR Generator is designed to handle any excess reactive power that surpasses the inverters' capabilities. Objective: The main goal is to allocate the reactive power setpoint between the inverters and the VAR Generator in a manner that ensures system stability and effectively manages fluctuations. It is crucial to keep the inverters operating within their specified limits and utilize the VAR Generator for any additional reactive power requirements. Requirements: - Calculation of total reactive power contributed by the inverters based on the number online and their individual capacities. - Allocation of remaining reactive power to be managed by the VAR Generator. - Implementation of a control strategy capable of handling fluctuations and maintaining system stability. Current Approach: To calculate the total reactive power provided by the inverters, the number of online inverters is multiplied by their capacities, with the total capped at 60%. Any remaining reactive power is then assigned to the VAR Generator. In conclusion, what is the most efficient and reliable method for achieving an optimal, stable operation of the system?
Do the inverters have the ability to show the reactive power being produced? As an employee at a DC generation and storage plant, my responsibilities include constructing rectifier banks for charging purposes and maintaining synchronization and inverters for discharging. Are the rectifiers and inverters manufactured in-house or sourced from an external supplier? I comprehend the objective you are aiming to achieve as it aligns with my primary role. Following your outlined plan is the most effective approach to accomplish your goal.
While there is valuable information available here, I would recommend checking out Control.com as well. The forum at https://control.com/forums/ is frequented by many professionals in the power generation industry.
Hello! Our controller efficiently manages inverters in normal scenarios, eliminating the need for additional devices to manipulate reactive power. At the Grid Connection Point (GCP), we can monitor and adjust the Power Factor (PF), reactive power, and active power based on setpoints received from the grid operator. Each inverter has a specific capacity and can only handle up to 60% of its capacity for reactive power. The number of online inverters may vary, and we can calculate the total reactive power they can generate at 60% capacity. Additionally, we have a 5MVAR VAR Generator to handle excess reactive power beyond the inverters' capacity. The controller operates in different modes, such as Fixed Value Reactive Power Mode, PF Mode, Voltage Mode, and Reactive Power Regulation. The goal is to distribute the reactive power setpoint between the inverters and the VAR Generator effectively. The Data logger/Controller controls the inverters using a PI block internally, sending commands that are not directly readable. However, real-time data from the meter allows us to monitor PF, voltage, active power, and reactive power. To optimize the system, consider whether the Data logger/Controller should handle both active and reactive power control. Should the calculated setpoint be sent to the VAR Generator for reactive power production, or should one of its modes be utilized instead? When receiving PF and voltage setpoints from the grid, determine how to utilize the SVG and distribute the power effectively. Seek guidance on the best hardware utilization and distribution methods for reactive power, including efficient use of the various modes available.
It appears that your current strategy involves assuming that inverters can output 60% of their capacity in reactive power, but this may not be the most effective approach. What if an inverter is de-rated or fails to meet the nominal reactive power output? It is essential to verify by measuring the actual reactive output of all inverters, calculating the total sum, and adjusting it to match the desired setpoint for your reactive power generator. Depending on your reactive power generation scheme, there may be limitations such as output 'steppiness' or minimum var output that require additional consideration. It is crucial to determine where the output reactive power is being measured, whether at the plant terminals or after a generation step-up transformer, as these values can vary significantly. You may need to include a correction factor for transformer impedance estimation in your system. I recommend setting the gross VAR setpoint at the site PLC, metering the output of each inverter, and sending the data to the PLC for calculations and adjustment of the reactive setpoint for the power generator. The PLC should also manage the operating mode of the reactive power generator based on instructions from the system operator regarding power factor, voltage, and reactive power regulation. It is important to note that PF/Voltage/Reactive control modes should be independent of the active power setpoint. Your system should be capable of operating in active power and PF control modes concurrently. Be mindful of potential complexities with inverters that can also function in PF/voltage control mode.
The Var generator has a capacity of 5 MegaVARs, but the required reactive energy is only 0.5 MVAR, which is significantly less. This means that the inverters can be largely disregarded in this scenario. However, there is a decision to be made whether to simply utilize the modes available on the Var generator or to implement a setpoint reactive power calculation in the PLC. Additionally, the integration of the data logger/controller, which controls the inverters, with the SVG poses a challenge. It is possible that the data logger/controller may only be able to control active power, leaving reactive power control to the SVG due to its higher capacity. When it comes to calculating the required reactive power in the PLC based on a voltage setpoint, precise calculations are crucial for optimal performance.
Your current approach for managing reactive power distribution seems logical. However, you might want to consider a more dynamic approach accounting for the variations in reactive power demand. Rather than sticking with a fixed 60% cap for the inverters, adjust this limit depending on the network conditions and the required stability margin. Coupled with an advanced control strategy like an adaptive PID or model predictive controller, which could better handle fluctuations and transient states, you would make full use of the inverters and reduce the reliance on VAR Generator. Remember, it's also crucial that the control strategy have a contingency plan in case of a sudden outage of an inverter or the VAR Generator.
An interesting project indeed! While your current approach seems viable, I'd suggest implementing an adaptive control algorithm. This algorithm would dynamically adjust the load between the inverters and the VAR Generator based on real-time system status. It's essentially a more flexible, responsive way to allocate reactive power, making it more likely to maintain system stability in different scenarios. Additionally, machine learning based predictive models could help in forecasting potential power fluctuations allowing more effective measures to maintain stability. Just a thought to consider - remember, simplicity can be beautiful, but not if it compromises system responsiveness and adaptability!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - The total reactive power contributed by the inverters is calculated by multiplying the number of online inverters by their individual capacities, with the total capped at 60%.
Answer: - The VAR Generator is designed to handle any excess reactive power that surpasses the inverters' capabilities, effectively managing fluctuations and ensuring system stability.
Answer: - The key requirements include calculating the total reactive power from inverters, allocating remaining reactive power to the VAR Generator, and implementing a control strategy to maintain system stability.
Answer: - By allocating the reactive power setpoint between the inverters and the VAR Generator in a balanced manner, the system can ensure that the inverters operate within their specified limits while efficiently managing fluctuations.
Answer: - The recommended approach involves calculating total reactive power from inverters, allocating remaining power to the VAR Generator, and implementing a robust control strategy to handle fluctuations and maintain system stability effectively.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.