"Marshall previously stated that the company believed ultrasonic testing of pipeline wall thickness was adequate. However, they have since discovered this is not the case." "Officials initially did not see the need for routine maintenance 'pigging' of these lines, as they transport refined crude oil without water content." "The company has increased spending on corrosion prevention to $72 million this year, an increase from $60 million the previous year. BP applies corrosion inhibitors and utilizes X-ray and ultrasound technology to inspect pipes." Read more at: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060807/ap_on_bi_ge/oil_field_corrosion_b2NibDltBHNlYwM3MTY- It's time to reassess the maintenance schedule for oil pipelines.
Bill Hedges, a corrosion expert at BP, noted that the Prudhoe Bay pipelines were built to last 25 years but have exceeded expectations by lasting 29 years, with many sections in excellent condition. It may be time to reevaluate the level of risk and estimate how much longer they can operate. Additionally, it is essential to monitor the water content post-removal process. Are operators or inspectors responsible for this monitoring?
Have you heard about the latest trend in the oil and gas industry? Internal pipe lining is being used to combat corrosion. Have you had any first-hand experience with this innovative solution? Let us know your thoughts.
I believe that implementing advanced technology for detecting pipe corrosion is crucial in the oil industry. With BP's extensive resources, they should have no problem investing in the necessary tools and expertise for regular monitoring. The recent oil spill and shutdown reflect a severe lack of oversight and accountability from both BP and regulatory agencies. It is imperative to reconsider opening up more land for oil exploration, especially when entrusted to potentially negligent and inexperienced management. Walt.
Can anyone provide details on the bacteria responsible for causing leaks? I am interested in learning more about this topic.
Inquiring minds want to know: What's the latest on bacteria possibly causing leaks? Has anyone come across information linking bacteria to leaks? Share your sources!
It really highlights the importance of constant innovation and implementation of safety practices in managing intricate systems like oil pipelines. Ultrasonic testing alone might not be foolproof but combining it with regular maintenance 'pigging' and incorporation of corrosion inhibitors could potentially mitigate unexpected shutdowns or faults. The step-up in spending on prevention speaks volumes about the gravity of the situation. It's not just about preventing environmental hazards, but also ensuring the longevity and performance of their pipelines. Establishing a solid maintenance schedule with newer technologies and regular check-ups seems non-negotiable at this point.
This definitely accentuates the need for continual reassessment of maintenance methodologies in the oil industry. It's clear that relying solely on ultrasonic testing was an oversight, and the necessity for pigging, especially for pipelines carrying refined crude oil, mustn't be sidelined. The increased expenditure on corrosion prevention is a step in the right direction, but it's equally critical to ensure these funds are directed towards effective and comprehensive maintenance strategies. Sometimes, it's the hard lessons that stimulate change.
It's indeed concerning to hear that initial ultrasonic tests didn't catch potential weaknesses in the pipeline. Just goes to show how crucial regular maintenance - 'pigging' the lines, in this case - really is for such structures. It's a good step forward that they've increased their corrosion prevention budget, but this should also serve as a wake-up call for other companies in the industry to reevaluate their preventative measures, especially where refined crude oil transportation is concerned. After all, a weak pipeline is a ticking time bomb for both the environment and the economy.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - The maintenance was delayed due to the company's belief that ultrasonic testing of pipeline wall thickness was sufficient, which was later found to be inadequate.
Answer: - Officials did not see the need for routine maintenance 'pigging' initially because the pipelines transport refined crude oil without water content.
Answer: - The company has increased spending on corrosion prevention to $72 million this year, up from $60 million the previous year. They utilize corrosion inhibitors and X-ray and ultrasound technology for pipe inspection.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.