I have a strong foundation in programming with TIA Portal in Ladder logic. Would you suggest that I begin learning SCL to make it my primary programming language? Thank you for your advice.
It is highly likely that you will encounter requests for various programming languages such as LAD, ST, FBD, and SCL as an OEM or systems house programmer. In a production environment, versatility is key - even if your company has a preferred language, you may need to work with a standard system to reduce costs. It is important not to restrict yourself to just one platform like Siemens, as diversifying your skills will increase your employability in the job market.
When it comes to logic operations, I personally find LAD to be the most user-friendly. For instance, it is easy to perform operations like AND and OR with contacts in LAD programming. On the other hand, SCL can be a bit more complicated as it typically requires a minimum of three lines of code using IF-THEN, the actual code, and END_IF statements. However, SCL excels when it comes to complex calculations compared to LAD. Therefore, it is beneficial to learn SCL in addition to LAD, although it should be noted that SCL is not your typical programming language. It is advisable to use a combination of programming languages based on the requirements of your project. Fortunately, with TIA (Totally Integrated Automation), you have the flexibility to integrate an SCL rung within a LAD program, allowing you to mix and match languages seamlessly. This provides you with the best of both worlds in terms of programming capabilities.
According to BryanG, SCL can be challenging due to its requirement of a minimum of three lines of code using IF-THEN, code, and END_IF. However, SCL is superior to LAD for calculations. It's important to note that a rung in SCL is not the same as an IF-THEN statement. For example, coilResult := ThisContact AND ThatContact OR ThatCondition is a code snippet that does not involve an IF statement. Troubleshooting digital logic in SCL may not be perfect, and visual languages may be easier to work with. Siemens allows for language definition per rung, while other platforms may require creating blocks to implement SCL logic, which excels in calculations and array-based logic/loops. Additionally, it is beneficial to also learn CFC or Rockwell FBD, powerful languages that differ from Siemens FBD.
I am always open to learning and am not claiming to be an expert on any subject. No offense is taken as I embrace opportunities to expand my knowledge.
When programming for S7-300/400, I suggest allocating 30% of the code to Ladder Diagram (LAD) and 70% to Structured Control Language (SCL). This distribution is necessary because S7-300/400 has limitations in LAD that can be overcome with SCL, such as indirect addressing, looping, and multiple data views using the 'AT' method. For more complex tasks in S7-300/400, one would typically turn to Statement List (STL) or SCL. In contrast, S7-1200/1500 eliminates these limitations, allowing for almost identical functionality in both LAD and SCL. However, SCL excels in data manipulation and looping, while LAD is preferred for its intuitive logic-building and online debugging capabilities. While SCL can become convoluted with too many brackets, LAD offers a more visual representation of logic flow. Therefore, in S7-1200/1500 projects, I recommend a split of 70% LAD and 30% SCL to leverage the strengths of both languages. Exclusively relying on SCL may not be optimal for most projects.
Absolutely, I would recommend branching out into SCL if you're already comfortable with Ladder Logic. SCL (Structured Control Language) is highly versatile and allows for more complex control strategies. Plus, diversifying your knowledge only gives you more tools in your programming toolkit. It may take a bit of time to adapt to it as it's text-based, compared to the graphical nature of Ladder logic, but it's a worthy investment in the long run. Good luck!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: Answer: Switching to SCL in TIA Portal programming can offer benefits such as better support for complex mathematical operations, enhanced flexibility in programming logic, and easier implementation of advanced functions compared to Ladder Logic.
Answer: Answer: The difficulty of transitioning from Ladder Logic to SCL in TIA Portal programming depends on your familiarity with structured text programming languages. While there may be a learning curve initially, with practice and guidance, you can successfully make the switch.
Answer: Answer: Yes, mastering SCL in TIA Portal programming can broaden your skillset and make you more versatile in industrial automation programming, potentially opening up new career opportunities and allowing you to work on a wider range of projects.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.