Dear all, I believe it is important to prioritize RELIABILITY over cost in maintenance practices. Improving reliability will ultimately lead to a decrease in costs, as cutting corners to save money can often result in decreased reliability. It is crucial to consider the total life cycle cost of equipment when making cost-related decisions. To illustrate this point, let me share a story: A Plant Manager discovered oil on the floor due to leaky gaskets. After investigating, it was revealed that the gaskets were faulty because they were purchased from the cheapest supplier. This decision was made based on a directive to prioritize cost savings, highlighting the negative consequences of solely focusing on price. In conclusion, it is vital to prioritize reliability in order to achieve long-term cost savings and prevent costly mistakes. Let's learn from past mistakes and ensure that quality is not sacrificed in the pursuit of cost reduction. Warm regards, Rolly Angeles, Teacher
Determining the optimal maintenance cost percentage is crucial for asset management. Industry experts suggest that maintenance costs should ideally fall between 1 to 3% of the Capital Replacement Value. Any cost exceeding this range may signal room for cost-saving opportunities, while costs below this benchmark may not be deemed necessary. It's important to strike the right balance to maximize efficiency and profitability in asset maintenance.
According to Josh, determining the optimal maintenance cost is crucial for efficiency. Ideally, maintenance costs should fall between 1 to 3% of the Capital Replacement Value. If costs exceed this range, cutting expenses may be necessary. However, investing in cheaper parts could lead to a reactive maintenance environment. It is more effective to reduce costs through reliability initiatives. Rolly Angeles, a knowledgeable teacher, emphasizes the importance of practicing this approach for long-term success.
I believe in strategic cost reductions as opposed to arbitrary cuts that are only made to improve KPIs for promotion. Intelligent cost cutting is essential for long-term success and sustainable growth in business.
Rolly, I believe your point is that Cost is the result of our actions rather than the foundation of our strategy. By having dependable equipment (such as skilled personnel, innovative design, quality parts, efficient systems, and strong support), we can keep costs low. A dedicated and high-quality workforce (motivated, skilled, and proud) also contributes to lower costs. Conversely, if a manager indiscriminately slashes budgets in an attempt to reduce costs, expenses will likely increase over time. This manager may move on before the repercussions are felt, maintaining their reputation as an 'efficient' manager elsewhere. Viva!
There seems to be a lack of discussion on cost-cutting strategies in this forum. Join the conversation and share your insights on reducing expenses.
Hi Rolly, I completely concur with your perspective. In my opinion, reliability, indeed, trumps cost in maintenance decisions. The narrative you provided about the Plant Manager is a clear example of how cost-cutting compromises on quality lead to higher total costs in the long run. In essence, it's the "pay me now, or pay me later" concept. Efforts to slash costs should always be balanced against potential risks and impacts on reliability. This is not just applicable to maintenance practices but to every aspect of business operations. The myth that low costs signify efficiency needs to be debunked. Thanks for the reminder!
Hi Rolly, I completely agree with your point. It's an age-old principle of "you get what you pay for." While cost-cutting can be beneficial in certain circumstances, it doesn't always translate into sustained cost savings over the long haul, especially when it comes to equipment maintenance. It reminds me of the saying "Penny wise, pound foolish" - saving a little now may end up costing more down the line. The focus should indeed be on total life cycle cost and not just the initial outlay. Thanks for making that powerful point with your story. Best, [Your Name]
Hi Rolly, I completely agree with your perspective on prioritizing reliability over cost! It's such a common pitfall to chase initial savings without considering the bigger picture—like how those “cheap” solutions can lead to more expenses down the line due to failures and repairs. Your story about the faulty gaskets is a perfect example of how short-sighted decisions can haunt us. Focusing on the total life cycle cost really helps ensure we're making smart investments that pay off in the long run. Thanks for shedding light on this crucial aspect of maintenance practices!
Hi Rolly, I completely agree with your perspective! It's so easy to get caught up in saving a few dollars upfront, but those short-sighted decisions can lead to much bigger headaches down the line. Your story about the gaskets really drives that point home—reliability should always be our guiding principle. Investing in quality upfront not only prevents costly repairs but also keeps our operations running smoothly and safely. Great to see this topic being discussed!
âś… Work Order Management
âś… Asset Tracking
âś… Preventive Maintenance
âś… Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - Prioritizing reliability over cost in maintenance practices is crucial because improving reliability can lead to long-term cost savings. Cutting corners to save money can result in decreased reliability, ultimately leading to higher costs in the future.
Answer: - Prioritizing reliability helps in reducing maintenance costs by preventing costly mistakes that may arise from choosing cheaper but less reliable options. Investing in reliability upfront can lead to lower maintenance costs over the equipment's total life cycle.
Answer: - Yes, for example, a Plant Manager discovered oil on the floor due to leaky gaskets that were purchased from the cheapest supplier to save costs. This decision led to faulty gaskets and highlighted the negative impact of solely focusing on price without considering reliability, resulting in additional maintenance expenses.
Answer: - When making cost-related decisions in maintenance practices, it is essential to consider the total life cycle cost of equipment. This includes evaluating factors such as initial purchase price, maintenance costs, downtime, and potential risks associated with choosing less reliable options.
Answer: -
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.