In Brighton, a new thread has been initiated with a question regarding duty/standby pumps controlled by level bridles on the reboiler upstream. These 4 KW pumps with mechanical seals experience shutdown when draining the level bridles, restarting shortly after. This process has been ongoing for 12 months, prompting the suggestion of implementing a Maintenance Override Switch (MOS) to prevent pump shutdowns. However, caution is advised before making any changes without a thorough HAZOP analysis. While the proposed solution may enhance pump performance, potential hazards related to monitoring and control of the MOS need to be evaluated to avoid any disasters. It is important to approach the problem with proper engineering and risk assessment before implementing any solutions. Rushing into a solution without fully understanding the issue and its consequences could lead to unforeseen complications.
Why is it necessary to drain the bridle and reboiler in Brighton? Shouldn't this be a standard procedure in boiler system maintenance?
The reboiler system is primarily designed to handle Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG), however, there is an issue with MEG and Gas Condensate mixing together. This causes condensate to build up on top of the MEG in the reboiler over time, resulting in inaccurate reboiler level readings in the control room due to the upper section of the bridles becoming filled.
Indeed, removing the excess steam from a steam drum's level gauge is akin to draining it when steam builds up above the water level. This process is crucial for maintaining optimal performance and safety in steam systems.
I couldn't agree more with your call for a thorough HAZOP analysis before making any changes. The implications of implementing a Maintenance Override Switch indeed need to be rigorously evaluated. Even if it could potentially solve the immediate pump shutdown issue, we must remain vigilant about any unexpected chain reactions that might occur downstream, or even completely unrelated outcomes altering safety protocols. Engineering solutions need to be comprehensive and encompassing. Therefore, a holistic risk assessment and an in-depth understanding of the issue are essential before proceeding with any modifications.
I completely agree with your caution for a thorough HAZOP before implementing the MOS. It's easy to want to rush to a perceived solution, especially when dealing with a problem that's persisted for so long. However, it's critically important that we fully understand the potential consequences before proceeding. A failed MOS could potentially result in a loss of control scenario that could be far worse than the intermittent pump shutdowns we're currently dealing with. The risk outweighs the benefit without proper assessment and engineering planning. Also, let's not forget, maintainability and reliability are as important as operational efficiency. A detailed failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in addition to HAZOP could be very beneficial for understanding the complete picture.
A worthy topic to be discussed indeed, and I appreciate your prioritizing of safety measures. Indeed, implementing an MOS could offer a practical solution, but I also agree with the necessity for a detailed HAZOP study beforehand. As an additional consideration, maybe the broader context of the operation could be evaluated. For instance, understanding whether this issue is a symptom of a larger problem like ineffective level bridle design or mechanical seal selection may also prove beneficial. Let's not treat just the symptom but also examine underlying causes before moving forward.
That's a great point about the importance of a thorough HAZOP analysis before implementing any changes, especially with something as critical as pumps that influence system stability. While a Maintenance Override Switch might seem like a straightforward fix to prevent those shutdowns, we should definitely consider all potential risks, including the long-term implications of bypassing standard shutdown procedures. I agree that an engineering approach with proper risk assessment is crucial here; taking the time to fully understand the system dynamics could save us from significant headaches down the line. It's all about finding the right balance between operational efficiency and safety!
You raise an excellent point about the risks involved in implementing a Maintenance Override Switch without a comprehensive HAZOP analysis. While it’s tempting to try to mitigate downtime for those pumps, we really need to consider the long-term implications and any potential safety hazards that could arise. A detailed risk assessment could help us identify any unintended consequences and ensure that we’re not just treating the symptoms but actually addressing the root cause. It might also be worth exploring alternative solutions that focus on optimizing the shut-off process or improving the level control system in the first place. Patience and thoroughness here could save us from larger issues down the line!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - The pumps are experiencing shutdowns due to the draining of the level bridles, which prompts a restart shortly after.
Answer: - Implementing a Maintenance Override Switch (MOS) is suggested as a solution to prevent pump shutdowns.
Answer: - Caution is advised to conduct a thorough HAZOP analysis to evaluate potential hazards related to monitoring and controlling the MOS before making any changes.
Answer: - It is crucial to conduct proper engineering and risk assessment to avoid unforeseen complications and disasters while implementing solutions.
Answer: - Rushing into a solution without a full understanding of the problem and its consequences could lead to unforeseen complications and hazards.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.