Greetings Community! I have successfully implemented Modbus integration with Fuxa. The configuration details are as follows: Protocol Type: ModbusTCP, Connection Options: TcpPort, Slave ID: 1. Despite setting the slave ID as 1, I am encountering an issue where all IDs are being detected when running scripts. I have thoroughly checked my script and there seems to be a discrepancy with my setup, as I confirmed the correct setup by using Modbus.exe and configuring it as a slave with ID 1. What course of action should I take to address this issue?
In Modbus TCP, the key identifier for a slave device is its IP address, rather than the slave ID. Although the protocol does support the use of the ID, it is typically utilized when accessing a Modbus RTU serial network through a gateway. This distinction is crucial for accurately communicating with devices on the network.
Hey there! It sounds like you’ve done a great job setting up your Modbus integration, but I can understand how frustrating that issue with the slave IDs can be. One thing to check is whether your script is properly filtering the requests by the Slave ID—sometimes the library used for communication doesn't strictly enforce the ID during read operations. Additionally, make sure there aren’t any settings or parameters in the Fuxa configuration that might be causing all IDs to be detected. If everything seems correct, you might want to try using a packet sniffer to see what’s being transmitted across the network; it could give you insight into whether the requests are being sent with the correct parameters. Hope that helps!
Hey there! It sounds like you've done a thorough job with your setup, but this issue could stem from a couple of things. First, double-check if your script is indeed targeting the correct slave ID in the request – sometimes, a minor oversight in the command can lead to unintended behavior. Also, consider enabling logging to see what requests are being sent out. It might give you a clearer picture if the script is defaulting to broadcast commands instead of addressing a specific slave. Lastly, ensure that there are no conflicting settings or devices on the network that could interfere with the Modbus communication. Good luck!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - This issue may arise due to a discrepancy in the setup configuration. Make sure to double-check the configuration settings, including the Slave ID, in both your script and the Modbus integration platform.
Answer: - To address this issue, you can start by verifying that the Slave ID is correctly set in both the script and the Modbus integration platform. Additionally, check for any conflicting settings or configurations that might be causing the problem.
Answer: - While the integration platform (e.g., Fuxa) may play a role in the issue, the core problem often lies in the configuration settings. Ensure that the Slave ID is correctly specified and that there are no conflicting configurations within the platform.
Answer: - To confirm the correct setup, you can use tools like Modbus.exe to configure the device as a slave with the desired ID. This can help validate whether the issue lies in the script or the integration platform settings.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.