My mind is truly perplexed by this situation; I can't seem to grasp it. There is no connection with - %M130(%MW11). How is this even feasible? If the %MW11 represents 0, does that indicate a logic 0? Conversely, if it represents 1, does that signify a logic 1?
It has been some time since I last engaged with TSX, but from what I recall, it appears to be an offset mechanism. If the value of %MW11 is set to 0, then the system utilizes the value of %M130. Conversely, if %MW11 equals 1, then it retrieves the value from %M131, and this pattern continues accordingly. I welcome corrections from other contributors if my understanding is inaccurate. - Paul
Thank you for your input! I'll give the online content a try and provide my feedback soon. It appears to have a cross-reference of -1, +1, and +2, which I look forward to exploring further.
It pertains to indirect addressing. The value must be no less than 0; otherwise, it will trigger an internal error alert within the program. This issue may arise from using a system bit of 16 or 18. You have the option to select a different system bit if the CPU is either halted or remains in a running state.
As indicated above, the values correspond as follows: 0 equals m130, 1 corresponds to m131, and so on.
What does the indirect reference to this signify? Is it related to the expression %MW55[%mw11]=1?
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.