Subject: Inquiry About MTTF Values in Safety Sensor Applications Hello, I recently reviewed a datasheet for a sensor intended for a safety-critical application, specifically looking for the B10 or B10D values. However, I discovered that the datasheet only presents the Mean Time to Failure (MTTF) value expressed in years. From my understanding, the MTTF is calculated by dividing the B10 value by the expected number of operations once the sensor is installed. My question is: how can the manufacturer provide an MTTF value in years without knowing the specific operational frequency that I plan to use? I'd appreciate any insights or clarifications on this matter. Best regards, UKB
It's been some time since I engaged in anything related to safety, but recalling what I know, the Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) is calculated using the formula: (Time Period * Number of Items Tested) / Number of Failures. For example, if you tested 2,142 sensors over the course of a year and experienced one failure, you would determine the MTTF based on these figures.
Upon visiting the IFM website, you'll notice that there isn't a B10d value available, as this unit does not utilize relay switching. This is my interpretation of the information presented. For further details, navigate to the "More Information" tab where you can find the Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) specifications. You can access the product page directly here: [IFM MK502A Product Details](http://www.ifm.com/products/us/ds/MK502A.htm). Additionally, for easy reference, you can view the certificate using this direct link: [MTTF Certificate for MK502A](http://www.ifm.com/files/mttf/MK502A.pdf).
When dealing with solid-state sensors, particularly those featuring OSSD (Output Signal Switching Device) outputs, the concepts of B10 and B10d become irrelevant. These metrics typically measure the mechanical lifespan of switching devices based on their operational cycles. Since solid-state devices lack mechanical components, they do not have a defined mechanical lifetime. This means that the mean time to failure (MTTFd) for solid-state devices can be directly utilized in safety assessments without additional calculations. In contrast, traditional devices like tongue interlock switches equipped with dry contacts necessitate a consideration of the expected number of operations and the B10d metric for accurately estimating their MTTFd.
Thank you for the clarification regarding the B10 value related to the wear of mechanical components. However, I still have some questions about how the Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) is expressed in terms of time rather than cycles. If the components in my system are activated more often than what the manufacturer’s testing protocol suggests, it seems likely that their failure rate would increase, leading to an MTTF that may not accurately reflect real-world performance. Wouldn’t it make more sense to present an average number of cycles until failure instead?
Thank you, Janner_10! That explanation is very clear and understandable.
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.