Joseph L. Dittberner introduces the concept of the "Second Standard" Rule, which states that when an adjustment is needed, the test should be conducted again using a different Test Equipment (Reference Standard). If the results from the second Test Equipment match those of the first, an adjustment should be made using either standard. However, if the results differ, further troubleshooting methods should be explored. In this scenario, the Cal Tech/Mech is advised to notify their supervisor. Thank you, Joseph L. Dittberner, ALZA.
Are you inquiring about primary and secondary test instruments used for calibration purposes?
Have you ever come across this unusual rule before? It may seem uncommon but when the first standard reading indicates that the instrument being tested is out of calibration and needs adjustment, a second standard is necessary to validate the initial test result. This can be interpreted as a lack of confidence in the calibration of the first standard because the instrument being tested failed the initial test.
This "Second Standard" Rule by Joseph L. Dittberner seems like a robust approach to troubleshooting which would certainly minimize errors in calibrations. It emphasizes the importance of cross verification before making any adjustments. I particularly like the inclusion of supervisor notification, which could help to resolve any discrepancies found during the testing phase quickly. This might reduce downtime caused in complex technical environments. Thanks for sharing this thoughtful rule with us.
Interesting concept from Joseph L. Dittberner. I find the "Second Standard" rule quite beneficial in reducing errors and ensuring precision in our measurements. It makes sense to cross-verify the results with a different reference standard, as it helps in identifying potential anomalies or inconsistencies. Plus, including the supervisory level when results vary adds a solid step in maintaining high-quality control. This method seems very applicable across various fields not just in Cal Tech/Mech scenarios, but anywhere precision is important. Thanks for sharing, makes for a great best practices discussion.
I appreciate Dittberner's "Second Standard" Rule as it emphasizes thoroughness and accuracy in testing procedures. It also seems like an excellent safeguard against erroneous measurements or calibration errors. On the other hand, it might be time-consuming and could potentially delay troubleshooting steps. But then again, it's always better to be safe than sorry, especially when precision is critical. Plus, the protocol to notify the supervisor in case of mismatched results is a good measure, ensuring that the situation is promptly addressed by more experienced personnel.
This "Second Standard" Rule really highlights the importance of reliability in testing processes. It's reassuring to have a systematic approach for verifying equipment results, especially when discrepancies arise. It makes sense to loop in a supervisor during these situations too; addressing potential issues collaboratively can lead to better troubleshooting and ultimately more accurate outcomes. Plus, it's a great reminder of how critical it is to ensure all equipment is calibrated correctly before trusting the data. Thanks for sharing this insight!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - The "Second Standard" Rule states that when an adjustment is needed for test equipment, the test should be conducted again using a different Test Equipment (Reference Standard).
Answer: - If the results from the second Test Equipment match those of the first, an adjustment should be made using either standard.
Answer: - If the results from the second Test Equipment differ from the first, further troubleshooting methods should be explored.
Answer: - If troubleshooting methods do not resolve the differences in test results, the Cal Tech/Mech is advised to notify their supervisor.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.