I am currently engaged in an ongoing conversation on Plant-Maintenance.com regarding the importance of advocating for effective asset management strategies. While there is widespread consensus on the fundamental concept, the crucial question remains: what is the potential economic impact of adopting sound asset management practices? Join the discussion and uncover the true value of transitioning to advanced asset management methodologies. - Terry O.
In the paper manufacturing industry, downtime due to equipment failure can be costly, with estimates of a tissue machine being down costing approximately $20,000 per hour. A decade ago, issues with felt roll bearings could lead to catastrophic failures, resulting in downtime of 6-8 hours. However, advancements in technology, such as vibration and temperature monitoring, now allow for early detection of potential issues. In case of a bearing hiccup, a quick shot of grease can often keep the machine running smoothly, minimizing costly downtime.
Our 1250MWe nuclear power plant, operating at $40 per megawatt-hour, incurs significant financial losses and potential equipment damage during plant trips. The downtime alone costs approximately $3.5 million in lost revenue, not to mention the overtime expenses to expedite getting back online and the impact on public perception. Certain circuits we monitor using infrared technology are susceptible to causing reactor trips due to single electrical failures. The failure of our reactor coolant pump motors results in a plant trip and requires around 11 days of downtime for motor replacement, costing $13 million. Evaluating these examples is straightforward, but assessing potential failures resulting from multiple equipment failures or abnormal plant operations is more complex. Additionally, maintenance issues that do not affect operations but create headaches when they occur are challenging to quantify. Determining the cost-effectiveness of maintenance practices compared to the reliability gained is also a difficult task.
I managed assets for the US Navy from January 1997 to January 2005, implementing RCM and Maintenance Effectiveness Reviews. Prior to 1997, the annual average of unplanned downtime was 6,577,058 ManHours, which decreased to 3,064,909 ManHours by January 2005. In 1993, I successfully applied a motor-system asset management strategy at a paper mill to reduce unplanned downtime from 26% to less than 6% within two years without increasing the maintenance budget. The maintenance savings were reinvested into the program until it was discontinued by a new owner. Subsequently, unplanned downtime increased back to over 26%. Properly tracking an asset management program can yield significant results.
Effective asset management is essential for maximizing lifecycle profits by optimizing revenue and minimizing costs. In my opinion, the potential lifecycle profit can range from 50% to 75% of the total lifecycle value.
Terrence, one of the key challenges in evaluating the impact of Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) on overall success is that it is just one piece of the puzzle. RCM does not generate results on its own until it is put into practice, properly measured, and competes with other initiatives. To truly understand its contribution, we must consider the role of other enablers like Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS). By adopting a Theory of Constraints mindset, we must evaluate the entire process rather than individual components. A successful company focuses on maximizing results from all initiatives and enhancing every part of the chain to sustain improvement. I have witnessed RCM projects deliver impressive returns ranging from 20:1 to 50:1, but the impact of enablers such as CMMS, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), compliance controls, and quality management cannot be overlooked. While enablers play a crucial role in optimizing results, it is ultimately RCM that drives significant change. Similarly, enablers contribute to the success of Root Cause Analysis (RCA), but they do not solely determine outcomes. They simply enhance the benefits. It is crucial to acknowledge the importance of enablers in achieving success, but success should be viewed holistically rather than focusing solely on individual components. V.Narayan. (Vee)
Great point, Terry. The economic impact of adopting solid asset management is often underestimated. Aside from just the raw savings from reduced breakdowns and repair costs, effective asset management can lead to increased productivity and efficiency. Assets are used optimally, minimizing wastage and unnecessary costs. Up-to-date, well-maintained machinery, for example, is less likely to break down and cause production disruptions, thereby avoiding potential financial losses. Furthermore, consider the long-term savings from extended asset lifecycles. With sound asset management, organizations can delay the high costs of purchasing new equipment. Investing in effective asset management is not just cost-effective; it's also a strategic move for any business.
Hi Terry, great topic! From my perspective, the potential economic impact of sound asset management can be substantial. It not only minimizes unnecessary costs due to inefficiencies or negligence, but also helps unlock value by ensuring assets are used to their fullest potential. For example, adopting predictive maintenance using IoT and AI technologies can significantly reduce downtime and repair costs, thereby increasing productivity and profitability. In addition, effective asset management can also enhance a business's understanding of their resources and improve decision making for investments. It's quite an intricate conversation, but I believe the long-term economic benefits can indeed outweigh the initial investment.
Hi Terry! I totally agree with your point about the potential economic impact of adopting effective asset management practices. It's easy to underestimate the value because the benefits aren't always immediately visible. In my experience, a well-executed asset management strategy not only increases operational efficiency, but also helps mitigate risk and brings about significant cost savings over time. Furthermore, it can drive better decision-making processes due to thorough visibility and control over assets. As they say, you can't manage what you don't measure!
✅ Work Order Management
✅ Asset Tracking
✅ Preventive Maintenance
✅ Inspection Report
We have received your information. We will share Schedule Demo details on your Mail Id.
Answer: - Effective asset management practices refer to the strategic approach of efficiently and proactively managing an organization's assets throughout their lifecycle to optimize performance, reduce costs, and mitigate risks.
Answer: - Adopting sound asset management practices can have a significant economic impact by improving operational efficiency, prolonging asset lifespan, reducing downtime, lowering maintenance costs, and enhancing overall productivity and profitability.
Answer: - Transitioning to advanced asset management methodologies can unlock various benefits such as improved decision-making based on data-driven insights, enhanced asset performance monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities, increased regulatory compliance, and better alignment with organizational objectives and stakeholders' expectations.
Join hundreds of satisfied customers who have transformed their maintenance processes.
Sign up today and start optimizing your workflow.